Glutamate neurotransmission in the cerebellar interposed nuclei: involvement in classically conditioned eyeblinks and neuronal activity.

The cerebellar interposed nuclei (IN) are critical components of a neural network that controls the expression of classically conditioned eyeblinks. The IN receive 2 major inputs: the massive, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated input from the Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex and the relatively weaker, glutamate-mediated input from collaterals of mossy and climbing fiber cerebellar afferent systems. To elucidate the role of IN glutamate neurotransmission in conditioned response (CR) expression, effects of blocking fast glutamatergic neurotransmission in the IN with gamma-d-glutamylglycine (DGG) on the expression of conditioned eyeblinks and on cerebellar nuclear neuronal activity were examined. Surprisingly, blocking fast glutamate receptors in the IN did not abolish CRs. DGG decreased CR incidence and slightly increased CR latency. In contrast, identical amounts of DGG applied to the cerebellar cortex abolished CRs. Similar to the behavioral effects, DGG had unexpectedly mild effects on IN neurons. At the population level, the baseline firing frequency of IN cells was not affected. After DGG injections, the incidence of excitatory modulation of cell activity in the interstimulus interval decreased but was not abolished. A combined block of fast glutamate and GABA(A) neurotransmission using a mixture of DGG and picrotoxin dramatically reduced CR incidence, increased the firing frequency of all cell types, and virtually abolished all modulation of neuronal activity. These results indicate that fast glutamate neurotransmission in the IN plays only an accessory role both in the expression of behavioral CRs and in the generation of associated neuronal activity in the IN.

[1]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[2]  J. Bloedel,et al.  Effects of muscimol inactivation of the cerebellar interposed-dentate nuclear complex on the performance of the nictitating membrane response in the rabbit , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. , 2003, Learning & memory.

[4]  M. Mauk,et al.  Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contributions to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[5]  Dieter Jaeger,et al.  The Contribution of NMDA and AMPA Conductances to the Control of Spiking in Neurons of the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  G. A. Clark,et al.  Initial localization of the memory trace for a basic form of learning. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  C. Jahr,et al.  Multivesicular Release at Climbing Fiber-Purkinje Cell Synapses , 2001, Neuron.

[8]  F. Tempia,et al.  Postsynaptic currents in deep cerebellar nuclei. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Mauk,et al.  A Mechanism for Savings in the Cerebellum , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Yeo,et al.  The Effect of Kainic Acid Lesions of the Cerebellar Cortex on the Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Response in the Rabbit , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  G. Lynch,et al.  The neurobiology of learning and memory , 1989, Cognition.

[13]  M. Mauk,et al.  Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[15]  S. Lisberger,et al.  The Cerebellum: A Neuronal Learning Machine? , 1996, Science.

[16]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D. Linden,et al.  Regulation of the rebound depolarization and spontaneous firing patterns of deep nuclear neurons in slices of rat cerebellum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Effects of lidocaine injection in the interpositus nucleus and red nucleus on conditioned behavioral and neuronal responses , 1990, Brain Research.

[19]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Intermediate cerebellum and conditioned eyeblinks. Parallel involvement in eyeblinks and tonic eyelid closure. , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[21]  J. Harvey,et al.  Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit during inactivation of the interpositus nucleus. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit? , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  David A. McCormick,et al.  Ipsilateral cerebellar lesions prevent learning of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response , 1982, Brain Research.

[24]  R. Llinás,et al.  Electrophysiology of guinea‐pig cerebellar nuclear cells in the in vitro brain stem‐cerebellar preparation. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Magnus Ivarsson,et al.  Cerebellar Mechanisms in Eyeblink Conditioning , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Steinmetz Brain substrates of classical eyeblink conditioning: a highly localized but also distributed system , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  James R. Bloedel,et al.  Effects of muscimol inactivation of the cerebellar interposed-dentate nuclear complex on the performance of the nictitating membrane response in the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  C. Yeo,et al.  Acquisition of Eyeblink Conditioning Is Critically Dependent on Normal Function in Cerebellar Cortical Lobule HVI , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  C. Yeo,et al.  Cerebellar Cortical AMPA–Kainate Receptor Blockade Prevents Performance of Classically Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Responses , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Mauk,et al.  Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses , 2002, Nature.

[32]  B. Gähwiler,et al.  Excitatory synaptic potentials in neurons of the deep nuclei in olivo-cerebellar slice cultures , 1992, Neuroscience.

[33]  N Ramnani,et al.  Reversible inactivations of the cerebellum prevent the extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in rabbits. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Narender Ramnani,et al.  Reversible inactivations of the cerebellum with muscimol prevent the acquisition and extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  S. Bao,et al.  Impaired classical eyeblink conditioning in cerebellar-lesioned and Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Madden,et al.  Cerebellar GABAergic processes: evidence for critical involvement in a form of simple associative learning in the rabbit. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  V. Bracha,et al.  GABA neurotransmission in the cerebellar interposed nuclei: involvement in classically conditioned eyeblinks and neuronal activity. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  D J Krupa,et al.  Reversible inactivation of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus completely prevents acquisition of the classically conditioned eye-blink response. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[39]  R F Thompson,et al.  Memory systems in the brain and localization of a memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Watkins,et al.  Experiments with kainate and quisqualate agonists and antagonists in relation to the sub-classification of 'non-NMDA' receptors. , 1990, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[41]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. , 1993, Science.

[42]  A. R. Freeman,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of the actions of strychnine, bicuculline and picrotoxin on the axonal membrane. , 1973, Journal of neurobiology.

[43]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  B. Gähwiler,et al.  Responses to excitatory amino acids of Purkinje cells' and neurones of the deep nuclei in cerebellar slice cultures. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  B. Gähwiler,et al.  Presynaptic GABAB receptors modulate IPSPs evoked in neurons of deep cerebellar nuclei in vitro. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  An Experimental Study of Posterior Interpositus Involvement in the Genesis and Control of Conditioned Eyelid Responses , 2002, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[47]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Intra-cerebellar infusion of NMDA receptor antagonist AP5 disrupts classical eyeblink conditioning in rabbits , 2000, Brain Research.

[48]  Im Joo Rhyu,et al.  Bidirectional Alterations in Cerebellar Synaptic Transmission oftottering and rollingCa2+ Channel Mutant Mice , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.