Differentiation of small hepatic hemangioma from small hepatocellular carcinoma: recently introduced spectral CT method.

PURPOSE To investigate the usefulness of computed tomographic (CT) spectral imaging parameters in differentiating small (≤3 cm) hepatic hemangioma (HH) from small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with or without cirrhosis, during the late arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PVP). MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was institutional review board approved, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors examined 49 patients (39 men, 10 women; 65 lesions) with CT spectral imaging during the AP and the PVP. Twenty-one patients had HH; nine, HCC with cirrhosis; and 19, HCC without cirrhosis. Iodine concentrations were derived from iodine-based material-decomposition CT images and normalized to the iodine concentration in the aorta. The difference in iodine concentration between the AP and PVP (ie, iodine concentration difference [ICD]) and the lesion-to-normal parenchyma ratio (LNR) were calculated. Two readers qualitatively assessed lesion types on the basis of conventional CT characteristics. Sensitivity and specificity were compared between the qualitative and quantitative studies. The two-sample t test was performed to compare quantitative parameters between HH and HCC. RESULTS Normalized iodine concentrations (NICs) and LNRs in patients with HH differed significantly from those in patients with HCC and cirrhosis and those in patients with HCC without cirrhosis: Mean NICs were 0.47 mg/mL ± 0.24 (standard deviation) versus 0.23 mg/mL ± 0.10 and 0.23 mg/mL ± 0.08, respectively, during the AP and 0.83 mg/mL ± 0.38 versus 0.47 mg/mL ± 0.86 and 0.52 mg/mL ± 0.11, respectively, during the PVP. Mean LNRs were 5.87 ± 3.36 versus 2.56 ± 1.10 and 2.29 ± 0.87, respectively, during the AP and 2.01 ± 1.33 versus 0.96 ± 0.16 and 0.93 ± 0.26, respectively, during the PVP. The mean ICD for the HH group (1.37 mg/mL ± 0.84) was significantly higher than the mean ICDs for the HCC-cirrhosis (0.33 mg/mL ± 0.29) (P < .001) and HCC-no cirrhosis (0.82 mg/mL ± 0.99) (P = .03) groups. The combination of NIC and LNR had higher sensitivity and specificity compared with those of conventional qualitative CT image analysis during individual and combined phases. CONCLUSION Use of spectral CT with fast tube voltage switching may increase the sensitivity for differentiating small hemangiomas from small HCCs in two-phase scanning.

[1]  M S van Leeuwen,et al.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  T. Kim,et al.  Arterioportal shunt: prevalence in small hemangiomas versus that in hepatocellular carcinomas 3 cm or smaller at two-phase helical CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  D. Hough,et al.  Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: bolus tracking with a 40-detector CT scanner to time arterial phase imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[5]  Tonsok Kim,et al.  Discrimination of small hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular malignant tumors smaller than 3 cm with three-phase helical CT. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  S. Park,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas with arterioportal shunt: sonographic appearances with CT and MRI correlation. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Y Menu,et al.  Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  P. Liu,et al.  [Triple-phase helical CT in the differential diagnosis between small hepatocellular carcinoma and small hepatic cavernous hemangioma]. , 2005, Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology].

[9]  Christianne Leidecker,et al.  Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  C. Johnson,et al.  Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT: value of contrast enhancement patterns. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Ariel Linden Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[12]  H. Bismuth,et al.  Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[13]  M. Mazzei,et al.  Small (≤2 cm) atypical hepatic haemangiomas in the non-cirrhotic patient: pattern-based classification scheme for enhancement at triple-phase helical CT , 2009, La radiologia medica.

[14]  Y Himeno,et al.  Hepatic hemangioma: findings with two-phase CT. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: improved detection and processing. , 1990, Radiology.

[16]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[17]  S. Wilson,et al.  Atypical hepatic hemangioma: a suggestive sonographic morphology. , 1993, Radiology.

[18]  F. Sutherland,et al.  Claude Couinaud: a passion for the liver. , 2002, Archives of surgery.