Immersive Collaborative Analysis of Network Connectivity: CAVE-style or Head-Mounted Display?

High-quality immersive display technologies are becoming mainstream with the release of head-mounted displays (HMDs) such as the Oculus Rift. These devices potentially represent an affordable alternative to the more traditional, centralised CAVE-style immersive environments. One driver for the development of CAVE-style immersive environments has been collaborative sense-making. Despite this, there has been little research on the effectiveness of collaborative visualisation in CAVE-style facilities, especially with respect to abstract data visualisation tasks. Indeed, very few studies have focused on the use of these displays to explore and analyse abstract data such as networks and there have been no formal user studies investigating collaborative visualisation of abstract data in immersive environments. In this paper we present the results of the first such study. It explores the relative merits of HMD and CAVE-style immersive environments for collaborative analysis of network connectivity, a common and important task involving abstract data. We find significant differences between the two conditions in task completion time and the physical movements of the participants within the space: participants using the HMD were faster while the CAVE2 condition introduced an asymmetry in movement between collaborators. Otherwise, affordances for collaborative data analysis offered by the low-cost HMD condition were not found to be different for accuracy and communication with the CAVE2. These results are notable, given that the latest HMDs will soon be accessible (in terms of cost and potentially ubiquity) to a massive audience.

[1]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  “Studierstube”: An environment for collaboration in augmented reality , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[2]  Steve Benford,et al.  MASSIVE: a distributed virtual reality system incorporating spatial trading , 1995, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[3]  Colin Ware,et al.  Visualizing graphs in three dimensions , 2008, TAP.

[4]  Thomas E. Levy,et al.  ArtifactVis2: Managing real-time archaeological data in immersive 3D environments , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[5]  Akira Kageyama,et al.  EVisualization of Vector Field by Virtual Reality , 2000 .

[6]  Benjamin D. Greenberg,et al.  An immersive virtual environment for DT-MRI volume visualization applications: a case study , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[7]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  A Study of Layout, Rendering, and Interaction Methods for Immersive Graph Visualization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Understanding together: sensemaking in collaborative information seeking , 2010, CSCW '10.

[9]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Shvil: collaborative augmented reality land navigation , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[11]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda , 2011, Inf. Vis..

[12]  Arthur Nishimoto,et al.  CAVE2: a hybrid reality environment for immersive simulation and information analysis , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Kim Marriott,et al.  IPSep-CoLa: An Incremental Procedure for Separation Constraint Layout of Graphs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Stereoscopic Highlighting: 2D Graph Visualization on Stereo Displays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Ganesh S. Oak Information Visualization Introduction , 2022 .

[16]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Design Considerations for Collaborative Visual Analytics , 2008, Inf. Vis..

[17]  Gregorij Kurillo,et al.  Telearch - Integrated visual simulation environment for collaborative virtual archaeology. , 2012 .

[18]  Bernd Fröhlich,et al.  The two-user Responsive Workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[19]  Gregory Kramida,et al.  Resolving the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict in Head-Mounted Displays , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Chris North,et al.  Effects of tiled high-resolution display on basic visualization and navigation tasks , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Olaf Kolditz,et al.  Concept and workflow for 3D visualization of atmospheric data in a virtual reality environment for analytical approaches , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[22]  D. Schmalsteig,et al.  Studierstube-An Environment for Collaboration in Augmented Reality , 1996 .

[23]  Bormin Huang,et al.  Visual analytics of terrestrial lidar data for cliff erosion assessment on large displays , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[24]  Regis Kopper,et al.  Comparison of interactive environments for the archaeological exploration of 3D landscape data , 2014, 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis).

[25]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Are two heads better than one?: object-focused work in physical and in virtual environments , 2006, VRST '06.

[26]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Supporting Communication and Coordination in Collaborative Sensemaking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[27]  Alex Endert,et al.  AxiSketcher: Interactive Nonlinear Axis Mapping of Visualizations through User Drawings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[28]  Xiaoyu Zhang,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of immersion for collaboration in virtual environments , 2005, VRST '05.

[29]  Fabien Picarougne,et al.  Beyond the classical monoscopic 3D in graph analytics: An experimental study of the impact of stereoscopy , 2014, 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on 3DVis (3DVis).

[30]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Creation and Collaboration: Engaging New Audiences for Information Visualization , 2008, Information Visualization.

[31]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[32]  C. Oman,et al.  Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. , 1990, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[33]  Jeffrey S. Norris,et al.  Immersive and collaborative data visualization using virtual reality platforms , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[34]  John F. Lucas,et al.  Exploring the Benefits of Immersion in Abstract Information Visualization , 2004 .

[35]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[36]  Chris North,et al.  Shaping the Display of the Future: The Effects of Display Size and Curvature on User Performance and Insights , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  Akira Kageyama,et al.  Visualization of Vector Field by Virtual Reality , 2000 .

[38]  Bruce H. Thomas,et al.  Tangible interaction techniques to support asynchronous collaboration , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[39]  Huahai Yang,et al.  Exploring collaborative navigation:: the effect of perspectives on group performance , 2002, CVE '02.

[40]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays , 2006, CHI.

[41]  Jens Gerken,et al.  IPSep-CoLa: An Incremental Procedure for Separation Constraint Layout of Graphs , 2006 .

[42]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  Task taxonomy for graph visualization , 2006, BELIV '06.