Prototypes and conceptual analysis

In this paper, I explore the implications of recent empirical research on concept representation for the philosophical enterprise of conceptual analysis. I argue that conceptual analysis, as it is commonly practiced, is committed to certain assumptions about the nature of our intuitive categorization judgments. I then try to show how these assumptions clash with contemporary accounts of concept representation in cognitive psychology. After entertaining an objection to my argument, I close by considering ways in which conceptual analysis might be altered to accord better with the empirical work.

[1]  C. Cherniak.  Prototypicality and deductive reasoning , 1984 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[3]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[5]  James W. Cornman,et al.  Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction , 1968 .

[6]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[8]  Sharon Lee Armstrong,et al.  What some concepts might not be , 1983, Cognition.

[9]  H. Putnam,et al.  The analytic and the synthetic , 1962 .

[10]  E. Rosch.  ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[11]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[12]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The role of familiarity in determining typicality , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[14]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[15]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[16]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? , 1978 .

[18]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[19]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models , 1986 .

[20]  Georges Rey.  Concepts and stereotypes , 1983, Cognition.

[21]  S. Stich,et al.  What Is a Theory of Mental Representation , 1992 .

[22]  J. Hampton.  An investigation of the nature of abstract concepts , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[24]  W. Freeman.  Second Commentary: On the proper treatment of connectionism by Paul Smolensky (1988) - Neuromachismo Rekindled , 1989 .

[25]  L. Barsalou.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[27]  P. Smolensky.  On the proper treatment of connectionism , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Georges Rey.  Concepts and conceptions: A reply to Smith, Medin and Rips , 1985, Cognition.

[29]  B. Williams,et al.  Problems of the Self: The self and the future , 1970 .

[30]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[31]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Concepts and concept formation. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Language and Mind , 1973 .

[33]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[34]  L. Rips.  Inductive judgments about natural categories. , 1975 .

[35]  H. Putnam.  Mind, Language and Reality: The meaning of ‘meaning’ , 1975 .

[36]  E. Rosch,et al.  Structural bases of typicality effects. , 1976 .

[37]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  The effect of context on the structure of categories , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.