OBJECTIVE
Risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy depend directly of the quality of anticoagulation. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized trials to assess the overall effectiveness of computer-based prescription systems on the quality of anticoagulation.
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trials were identified through electronic searches of the Medline database (1966-1997) and systematic analyses of the references of articles. Two investigators selected relevant papers and summarized data from the studies.
METHODS
The outcome variable was the proportion of days within the target range of anticoagulation. A pooled estimate of the common odds ratio of being in the target range and its confidence interval was obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS
Seven trials having included 1217 patients were identified. Computer systems were based on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and a bayesian prediction method. Most of them concerned the oral anticoagulant warfarin. The global odds ratio of being in the target range was 1.58 [95% CI: 1.34-1.86], thus meaning that the use of a computer for anticoagulation optimization increased by 58% the proportion of visits where patients were appropriately treated. The proportion of clinical events was too low for allowing a summary analysis.
CONCLUSION
Evidence from randomized controlled trials supports the effectiveness of computer-aided anticoagulant prescription. Diffusion of these systems in ambulatory care could increase the benefit/risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment at a low cost.