Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task

This study sought evidence of observational motor learning, a type of learning in which observation of the skilled performance of another person not only facilitates motor skill acquisition but does so by contributing to the formation of effector-specific motor representations. Previous research has indicated that observation of skilled performance engages cognitive processes similar to those occurring during action execution or physical practice, but has not demonstrated that these include processes involved in effector-specific representation. In two experiments, observer subjects watched the experimenter performing a serial reaction time (SRT) task with a six-item unique sequence before sequence knowledge was assessed by response time and/or free generation measures. The results suggest that: (1) subjects can acquire sequence information by watching another person performing the task (Experiments 1-2); (2) observation results in as much sequence learning as task practice when learning is measured by reaction times (RTs) and more than task practice when sequence learning is measured by free generation performance (Experiment 2, Part 1); and (3) sequence knowledge acquired by model observation can be encoded motorically—that is, in an effector-specific fashion (Experiment 2, Part 2).

[1]  K. Leibovic Information Processing in The Nervous System , 1969, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[4]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  H. T. A. Whiting,et al.  The Effect of the Availability of a Dynamic Model on the Acquisition of a Complex Cyclical Action , 1987 .

[6]  M. Smyth,et al.  Movement and Working Memory: Patterns and Positions in Space , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  On learning complex procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  M M Smyth,et al.  Working Memory for Movements , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[11]  M. Smyth,et al.  Space and Movement in Working Memory , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  A Bandura,et al.  Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  The Role of Action in Implicit Learning , 1991 .

[14]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  R Ivry,et al.  Cerebellar Involvement in the Explicit Representation of Temporal Information a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  S. Vogt,et al.  On relations between perceiving, imagining and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[18]  K Inomata,et al.  Effects of Angle of Model-Demonstration on Learning of Motor Skill , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  John Annett,et al.  Imagery and motor processes: Editorial overview , 1995 .

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  D R Shanks,et al.  Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  L. Proteau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Observational Learning of Motor Skills , 1999 .

[25]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[26]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[27]  N. Harvey,et al.  Assessing Sequential Knowledge through Performance Measures: The Influence of Short-term Sequential Effects , 1999 .

[28]  R. Hari,et al.  Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A M Burton,et al.  Learning complex sequences: no role for observation? , 2001, Psychological research.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.