The Dynamics of Indian Labour: Ramifications for Future of Work and Sustainability

The labour market is complex to systematise into a well-behaved structure. Here, we attempt to understand the synergy between actors and institutions in the Indian labour market and to reveal the implications for the future of work and sustainability. Combining aggregated and micro-level data from multiple sources, we examine the indicators regarding the macro economy, production and engagement in firms, and changes in the occupational structure of workers. While the familiar narrative of technology–labour acrimony emerges, it is weak. In contrast, the tie between economy and technology is a favourable representation of the proximity between human capital and technology. Inadequate human capital implies chances of non-absorption in employment, especially in the future, even for a labour-abundant country such as India. While labour market flexibility through tripartite contact work does not directly relate to labour productivity, high-wage blue-collar work is a more promising factor that aligns with productivity. On the sustainability front, upgrading environmental standards results in more cohesion between labour and capital. The conventional logic of substitutability between capital and labour is invalid when firms adopt environmental standards. From a policy vantage, the scenarios of sustainability transition to cleaner technologies and decent work require complementarity between capital and labour. Considering the dimension of upgrading in order to transition towards sustainability is an essential factor for understanding the future of work.

[1]  Unmesh Patnaik,et al.  Transition to sustainable development in the tanning industry: Evidence from leather value chain in Tamil Nadu, India , 2023, Sustainable Development.

[2]  M. I. Ramírez,et al.  Employment and sustainability: The relation between precarious work and spatial inequality in the neoliberal city , 2022, World Development.

[3]  Unmesh Patnaik,et al.  Employment, Technology and Value Chain: A Case of Indian Leather Industry , 2021, Science, Technology and Society.

[4]  Angèle Christin,et al.  Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control , 2020, Academy of Management Annals.

[5]  W. Stahel,et al.  The Circular Economy , 2019 .

[6]  Anuneeta Mitra Returns to Education in India: Capturing the Heterogeneity , 2019, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies.

[7]  Robert H. W. Boyer,et al.  Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward , 2016 .

[8]  David H. Autor,et al.  Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace , 2015 .

[9]  R. Feenstra,et al.  The Next Generation of the Penn World Table , 2013 .

[10]  V. Bobkov,et al.  Risks of Society Stability and Precarity of Employment: A Look at Russia , 2013 .

[11]  G. Kingdon,et al.  Heterogeneous Returns to Education in the Labor Market , 2012 .

[12]  Magnus Boström,et al.  A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue , 2012 .

[13]  Gaurav Nayyar The quality of employment in India's services sector: exploring the heterogeneity , 2011 .

[14]  S. Vallance,et al.  What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts , 2011 .

[15]  Alan S. Morris,et al.  ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standards: Engineering and Financial Aspects , 2007 .

[16]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods , 2002 .

[17]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[18]  Cha Zhang,et al.  Ensemble Machine Learning , 2012 .