Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope for emergency intubation in the prehospital setting: A randomized control trial*

Objectives:The optical Airtraq laryngoscope (Prodol Meditec, Vizcaya, Spain) has been shown to have advantages when compared with direct laryngoscopy in difficult airway patients. Furthermore, it has been suggested that it is easy to use and handle even for inexperienced advanced life support providers. As such, we sought to assess whether the Airtraq may be a reliable alternative to conventional intubation when used in the prehospital setting. Design, Setting, and Patients:Prospective, randomized control trial in emergency patients requiring endotracheal intubation provided by anesthesiologists or emergency physicians responding with an emergency medical service helicopter or ground unit associated with the Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Measurements and Main Results:During the 18-month study period, 212 patients were enrolled. When the Airtraq was used as first-line airway device (n = 106) vs. direct laryngoscopy (n = 106), success rate was 47% vs. 99%, respectively (p < .001). Reasons for failed Airtraq intubation were related to the fiber-optic characteristic of this device (i.e., impaired sight due to blood and vomitus, n = 11) or to assumed handling problems (i.e., cuff damage, tube misplacement, or inappropriate visualization of the glottis, n = 24). In 54 of 56 patients where Airtraq intubation failed, direct laryngoscopy was successful on the first attempt; in the remaining two and in one additional case of failed direct laryngoscopy, the airway was finally secured employing the Fastrach laryngeal mask. There was no correlation between success rates and body mass index, age, indication for airway management, emergency medical service unit, or experience of the physicians. Conclusions:Based on these results, the use of the Airtraq laryngoscope as a primary airway device cannot be recommended in the prehospital setting without significant clinical experience obtained in the operation room. We conclude that the clinical learning process of the Airtraq laryngoscope is much longer than reported in the anesthesia literature.

[1]  K. Toker,et al.  Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq® and LMA CTrach™ devices * , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[2]  K. Candiotti,et al.  Prehospital Intubations and Mortality: A Level 1 Trauma Center Perspective , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  G. Savoldelli,et al.  Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study , 2009, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[4]  W. Gaszyński,et al.  [A comparison of the optical AirTraq and the standard Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in obese patients]. , 2009, Anestezjologia intensywna terapia.

[5]  R. Amathieu,et al.  Optimising tracheal intubation success rate using the Airtraq laryngoscope , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[6]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Airtraq optical laryngoscope: tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  S. Donahue,et al.  Comparison of Use of the the Airtraq with Direct Laryngoscopy by Paramedics in the Simulated Airway , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[8]  M. Castañeda Pascual,et al.  [Management of the easy or complicated airway by nonexperts using the AirTraq optical laryngoscope]. , 2009, Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación.

[9]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Airtraq laryngoscope has an advantage over Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists , 2009, Journal of Anesthesia.

[10]  G. Savoldelli,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope®, the McGrath®, the Airtraq® and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[11]  G. Savoldelli,et al.  Use of the Airtraq as the primary technique to manage anticipated difficult airway: a report of three cases. , 2008, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[12]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscopes * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[13]  F. Lecky,et al.  Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  I. Stiell,et al.  The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[15]  M. Woollard,et al.  Airway Management at Floor Level: A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation using the Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes , 2008, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

[16]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation* , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[17]  M. Woollard,et al.  Airtraq vs standard laryngoscopy by student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a model of difficult intubation * , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[18]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  In-line head and neck position is preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position , 2008, Journal of Anesthesia.

[19]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes and the ILMA in novice users: a manikin study , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[20]  M. Woollard,et al.  Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in a model of difficult intubation by prehospital providers not previously trained in laryngoscopy , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[21]  R. Amathieu,et al.  A comparison of two techniques for inserting the Airtraq™ laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[22]  J. Laffey,et al.  Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[23]  J. Laffey,et al.  Retention of tracheal intubation skills by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes * , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[24]  J. Laffey,et al.  Tracheal intubation by inexperienced medical residents using the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes--a manikin study. , 2006, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[26]  B. Harte,et al.  Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[27]  M. Helm,et al.  Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting--a multicentre study in the German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[28]  T. Mort.  Preoxygenation in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[29]  D. Davis,et al.  The impact of prehospital endotracheal intubation on outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[30]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and outcome after traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[31]  D. Davis,et al.  The impact of hypoxia and hyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence intubation of severely head-injured patients. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.