Using simulated terrestrial laser scanning to analyse errors in high-resolution scan data of irregular surfaces

Abstract Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) is increasingly being used to collect mm-resolution surface data from a broad range of environments. When scanning complex surfaces, interactions between the surface topography, laser footprint and scanner precision can introduce errors into the point cloud. Quantification of these errors is, however, limited by the availability of independent measurement techniques. This research presents simulated TLS as a new approach to error quantification. Two sets of experiments are presented. The first set demonstrates that simulated TLS is able to reproduce real TLS data from a plane and a pebble. The second set uses simulated TLS to assess a methodology developed for the collection and processing of field TLS data. Simulated TLS data is collected from surfaces up to ∼1 m 2 created from regular arrays of uniform spheres (sphere diameters of 10 to 100 mm) and irregular arrays of mixed spheres (median sphere diameters of 16 to 94 mm). These data were analysed to (i) assess the effectiveness of the processing methodology at removing erroneous points; (ii) quantify the magnitude of errors in a digital surface model (DSM) interpolated from the processed point cloud; and (iii) investigate the extent to which the interpolated DSMs retained the geometric properties of the original surfaces. The processing methodology was found to be effective, especially on data from coarser surfaces, with the retained points typically having an inter-quartile range (IQR) of point errors of ∼2 mm. DSM errors varied as a function of sphere size and packing, with DSM errors having an IQR of ∼2 mm for the regular surfaces and ∼4 mm for the irregular surfaces. Finally, whilst in the finer surfaces point and DSM errors were a substantial proportion of the sphere diameters, geometrical analysis indicated that the DSMs still reproduced properties of the original surface such as semivariance and some percentiles of the surface elevation distribution.

[1]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM–CW terrestrial laser scanner system , 2007 .

[2]  S. I. Granshaw,et al.  BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT METHODS IN ENGINEERING PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2006 .

[3]  Gerard V. Middleton,et al.  Origin of sedimentary rocks , 1972 .

[4]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  From laser point clouds to surfaces: Statistical nonparametric methods for three-dimensional reconstruction , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Precise range estimation on known surfaces by analysis of full-waveform laser , 2006 .

[6]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[7]  D. Meadows,et al.  Generation of surface contours by moiré patterns. , 1970, Applied optics.

[8]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[9]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  On gravel‐bed roughness characterization , 1998 .

[11]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[12]  Giordano Teza,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanner and retro‐reflective targets: an experiment for anomalous effects investigation , 2007 .

[13]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error Models and Propagation in Directly Georeferenced Terrestrial Laser Scanner Networks , 2005 .

[14]  P. Burrough Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment , 1986 .

[15]  Hilmar Ingensand,et al.  Metrological Aspects in Terrestrial Laser Scanning Technology , 2008 .

[16]  Stuart Robson,et al.  ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENTS MADE WITH A CYRAX 2500 LASER SCANNER AGAINST SURFACES OF KNOWN COLOUR , 2004 .

[17]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[18]  Edward W. Bork,et al.  Influence of Vegetation, Slope, and Lidar Sampling Angle on DEM Accuracy , 2006 .

[19]  J. Brasington,et al.  In situ characterization of grain‐scale fluvial morphology using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2009 .

[20]  H. Eisenbeiss,et al.  Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modelling of the Late Intermediate Period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa, Peru , 2007 .

[21]  S. Lane,et al.  Characterization of the Structure of River-Bed Gravels Using Two-Dimensional Fractal Analysis , 2001 .

[22]  K. Kraus,et al.  FROM SINGLE-PULSE TO FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNERS: POTENTIAL AND PRACTICAL CHALLENGES , 2004 .

[23]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[24]  D. Petley,et al.  Combined Digital Photogrammetry and Time‐of‐Flight Laser Scanning for Monitoring Cliff Evolution , 2005 .

[25]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[26]  P. Radtke,et al.  Detailed Stem Measurements of Standing Trees from Ground-Based Scanning Lidar , 2006, Forest Science.

[27]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[28]  J. Chandler Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research: Earth Surf , 1999 .

[29]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost-effective non-metric close-range digital photogrammetry and its application to a study of coarse gravel river beds , 2003 .

[30]  Benjamin Koetz,et al.  Ray tracing for modeling of small footprint airborne laser scanning returns , 2007 .

[31]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Laser Scanner Simulator for System Analysis and Algorithm Development: a Case with Forest Measurements , 2007 .

[32]  Bharat Lohani,et al.  AIRBORNE ALTIMETRIC LIDAR SIMULATOR: AN EDUCATION TOOL , 2006 .

[33]  D. Lichti,et al.  Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners , 2006 .