Image-Quality Assessment for Several Positron Emitters Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards in the Siemens Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner

The positron emitters 18F, 68Ga, 124I, and 89Zr are all relevant in small-animal PET. Each of these radionuclides has different positron energies and ranges and a different fraction of single photons emitted. Average positron ranges larger than the intrinsic spatial resolution of the scanner (for 124I and 68Ga) will deteriorate the effective spatial resolution and activity recovery coefficient (RC) for small lesions or phantom structures. The presence of single photons (for 124I and 89Zr) could increase image noise and spillover ratios (SORs). Methods: Image noise, expressed as percentage SD in a uniform region (%SD), RC, and SOR (in air and water) were determined using the NEMA NU 4 small-animal image-quality phantom filled with 3.7 MBq of total activity of 18F, 68Ga, 124I, or 89Zr. Filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered-subset expectation maximization in 2 dimensions, and maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstructions were compared. In addition to the NEMA NU 4 image-quality parameters, spatial resolutions were determined using small glass capillaries filled with these radionuclides in a water environment. Results: The %SD for 18F, 68Ga, 124I, and 89Zr using FBP was 6.27, 6.40, 6.74, and 5.83, respectively. The respective RCs were 0.21, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.19 for the 1-mm-diameter rod and 0.97, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.88 for the 5-mm-diameter rod. SORs in air were 0.01, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively, and in water 0.02, 0.10, 0.13, and 0.02. Other reconstruction algorithms gave similar differences between the radionuclides. MAP produced the highest RCs. For the glass capillaries using FBP, the full widths at half maximum for 18F, 68Ga, 124I, and 89Zr were 1.81, 2.46, 2.38, and 1.99 mm, respectively. The corresponding full widths at tenth maximum were 3.57, 6.52, 5.87, and 4.01 mm. Conclusion: With the intrinsic spatial resolution (≈1.5 mm) of this latest-generation small-animal PET scanner, the finite positron range has become the limiting factor for the overall spatial resolution and activity recovery in small structures imaged with 124I and 68Ga. The presence of single photons had only a limited effect on the image noise. MAP, as compared with the other reconstruction algorithms, increased RC and decreased %SD and SOR.

[1]  R. Laforest,et al.  Positron range modeling for statistical PET image reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[2]  H. Herzog,et al.  PET imaging with yttrium-86: comparison of phantom measurements acquired with different PET scanners before and after applying background subtraction , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  R. K. Bull,et al.  Stopping powers for electrons and positrons: ICRU Report 37; 271 pp.; 24 figures; U.S. $24.00. , 1986 .

[4]  Bradley J Beattie,et al.  Quantitative imaging of bromine-76 and yttrium-86 with PET: a method for the removal of spurious activity introduced by cascade gamma rays. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Advances in the production, processing and microPET image quality of technetium-94m. , 2006, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[6]  M. Lubberink,et al.  Quantitative imaging and correction for cascade gamma radiation of 76Br with 2D and 3D PET. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[8]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity of the Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[10]  Mark Lubberink,et al.  Quantitative imaging of 124I and 86Y with PET , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  S. Walrand,et al.  Quantitation in PET using isotopes emitting prompt single gammas: application to yttrium-86 , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. A. Parker,et al.  Modeling and simulation of positron range effects for high resolution PET imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  K S Pentlow,et al.  Quantitative imaging of iodine-124 with PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  G. Glatting,et al.  Quantitative imaging of yttrium-86 PET with the ECAT EXACT HR+ in 2D mode. , 2004, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[16]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Richard Laforest,et al.  Quantitative small animal PET imaging with nonconventional nuclides. , 2009, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[18]  R. Trébossen,et al.  Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Jogeshwar Mukherjee,et al.  Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[21]  Val J Lowe,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2007 performance measurements of the Siemens Inveon™ preclinical small animal PET system , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  A. Schmid,et al.  PET quantitation and imaging of the non-pure positron-emitting iodine isotope 124I. , 2002, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[23]  R. Laforest,et al.  Cascade removal and microPET imaging with 76Br , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  M. Partridge,et al.  Optimization and assessment of quantitative 124I imaging on a Philips Gemini dual GS PET/CT system , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  A. Groves,et al.  Non-[18F]FDG PET in clinical oncology. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.