The effect of stress on the suppression of erroneous competing responses.

Abstract Evidence exists that the intention to perform certain cognitive tasks activates, unintentionally, competing responses and computations that intrude on the performance of the intended tasks. For the intended task to be performed effectively, such intrusions must be controlled. Two experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that stress heightens the difficulty of exercising effective control over erroneous competing responses, a possible explanation of decrements in the performance of cognitive tasks under stress. Participants performed four tasks, which contained features that could potentially prime or activate erroneous responses. The results demonstrated that the interference of these features with performance was more pronounced among stressed than among less-stressed participants. The need for a more comprehensive theory of the effects of stress on information processing is discussed.

[1]  G D Logan,et al.  On the autonomy of mental processes: a case study of arithmetic. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  G. Keinan.  Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation Failure: Past, Present, and Future , 1996 .

[4]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview , 1996 .

[5]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[6]  D. Wegner.  Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[7]  June Rathbone,et al.  The ‘Emotional’ Stroop Task , 2001 .

[8]  F. Strack.  The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies , 1992 .

[9]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Controlling anger: Self-induced emotion change. , 1993 .

[10]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[11]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[12]  M. Kozak,et al.  Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Alan D. Baddeley.  Selective attention and performance in dangerous environments. , 1972 .

[14]  S. Plous,et al.  Thinking the Unthinkable : The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear Warl , 1989 .

[15]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[16]  R. McNally,et al.  Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. , 1990, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  Edward R. Watkins,et al.  Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective , 1997 .

[18]  G. Keinan,et al.  Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under physical threat , 1987 .

[19]  C. Golden.  A group version of the Stroop Color and Word Test. , 1975, Journal of personality assessment.

[20]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[21]  Giora Keinan,et al.  Chunking and integration: effects of stress on the structuring of information , 1991 .

[22]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  G. Logan.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[25]  Stevan E. Hobfoll,et al.  The ecology of stress , 1988 .

[26]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. , 1991 .

[27]  A. Lacic.  [A new look]. , 1989, Pielegniarka i polozna.

[28]  B. E. Keen,et al.  The Suppression , 1969 .

[29]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  D. Gilbert.  How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[31]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative emotion and superficial social processing , 1992 .

[32]  J. Tecce,et al.  Effects of Heightened Drive (Shock) on Performance in a Tachistoscopic Color-Word Interference Task , 1965, Psychological reports.

[33]  D. Bailey,et al.  The effects of stress. , 1977, NLN publications.

[34]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[35]  K. Mogg,et al.  Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. , 1990, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[36]  Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  G. Keinan,et al.  The effects of stress, ambiguity tolerance, and trait anxiety on the formation of causal relationships. , 1991 .

[38]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[39]  Charles J. Golden,et al.  A Manual for the Clinical and Experimental Use of the Stroop Color and Word Test , 1978 .

[40]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  F. Strack,et al.  Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility , 1997 .

[42]  Chris Idzikowski,et al.  Fear and performance in novice parachutists , 1987 .

[43]  Automatic and dysfunctional cognitive processes in depression. , 1989 .

[44]  N Moray,et al.  Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  D M Wegner,et al.  Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[48]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[49]  G. Keinan.  Effects of stress and tolerance of ambiguity on magical thinking. , 1994 .

[50]  Changing our minds: An introduction to mental control. , 1993 .

[51]  D M Wegner,et al.  The suppression of exciting thoughts. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  M. Kozak,et al.  Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[53]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. , 1992 .

[54]  R. Baron,et al.  Exercise and the illusory correlation: Does arousal heighten stereotypic processing? , 1988 .

[55]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Chapter 5 – The Role of Anxiety in Facilitating Stereotypic Judgments of Outgroup Behavior , 1993 .

[56]  Peter Wright.  The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. , 1974 .

[57]  G. Logan,et al.  When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task , 1979 .

[58]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[60]  Effects of Heightened Drive (Shock) on 2-, 4-, and 8-Choice Card-Sorting , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[61]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[62]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .