Cognitive Support for the Organization of Writing

This paper describes a novel framework and a system to support writing professional documents. Our framework focuses on aiding the process of organizing ideas and constructing logical connections between text chunks in formal documents. Most previous approaches dealing with these issues have utilized one of three types of representations: a tree, a map, and a network. However, they all have their strengths and weaknesses. The tree is superior in helping the writers to grasp the hierarchical structure of a document, but it is difficult to express vague relationships among parts of a document. The map is easy to operate, but it restricts freedom in spatial organization. The network has flexibility to express what writers want, but it requires additional graphical objects to specify relationships among parts and it cannot be naturally transformed into a linear document. In our approach, the tree and the map are integrated: the local structure of a document is defined by the map while the global structure of the document is defined by the tree. Combining both representations has the following advantages: (1) it leverages the benefits of both representations, (2) it seamlessly supports both top-down organization and bottom-up organization, and (3) it smoothly supports writing from an ill-organized state to a well-organized state. Based on the proposed framework, we have built a system called iWeaver. We describe experiments in which six users wrote six technical documents using the system. The results show that our framework is an effective aid for constructing long, structured documents.

[1]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Embedding critics in design environments , 1993, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[2]  Francisco Gomes de Matos,et al.  How we write. Writing as creative design , 1999 .

[3]  Yasuyuki Sumi,et al.  Computer-Aided Thinking by Mapping Text-Objects Into Metric Spaces , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[4]  網谷 重紀 A method and a system for supporting the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[5]  Lyn Pemberton,et al.  Representing Writing: External Representations and the Writing Process , 1992 .

[6]  Yasuhiro Yamamoto,et al.  Spatial Hypertext for linear-information authoring: Interaction design and system development based on the ART Design principle , 2002, HYPERTEXT '02.

[7]  Michael T. Moore The Relationship between the Originality of Essays and Variables in the Problem-Discovery Process: A Study of Creative and Noncreative Middle School Students. , 1985 .

[8]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Supporting Incremental Formalization with the Hyper-Object Substrate , 1999 .

[9]  Mark Torrance,et al.  Conceptual processes in writing: from problem solving to text production , 1999 .

[10]  David Kaufer,et al.  The Notes program: a hypertext application for writing from source texts , 1987, Hypertext.

[11]  John S. Gero,et al.  Computational Models of Creative Design Processes , 1994 .

[12]  John B. Smith,et al.  A hypertext writing environment and its cognitive basis (panel session) , 1987, Hypertext.

[13]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information , 1995, CHI '95.

[14]  C. C. Wood,et al.  A Cognitive Dimensional Analysis of Idea Sketches , 1993 .

[15]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  A system for visualizing the viewpoints of information and its application to intelligent activity support , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[16]  Turn signals are the facial expressions of automobiles: Donald A. Norman Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992. xiv + 205 pp. ISBN 0-201-58124-8 , 1994 .

[17]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[18]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for hypertext notes network linearization , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Gail E. Hawisher The Effects of Word Processing on the Revision Strategies of College Freshmen , 1987 .

[20]  J. Lutz A Study of Professional and Experienced Writers Revising and Editing at the Computer and with Pen and Paper , 1987 .

[21]  Koichi Hori,et al.  A System for Aiding Creative Concept Formation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[22]  David Kaufer,et al.  Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting , 1990, CSCW '90.

[23]  Judith A. Langer The Effects of Available Information on Responses to School Writing Tasks. , 1984 .

[24]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[25]  John R. Hayes,et al.  Writing as Problem Solving. , 1979 .

[26]  Mike Sharples,et al.  An Account of Writing as Creative Design , 1996 .

[27]  Michael Joyce Storyspace as a hypertext system for writers and readers of varying ability , 1991, HYPERTEXT '91.

[28]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[30]  Koichi Hori,et al.  A Framework to Support Writing as Design Using Multiple Representations , 2002 .

[31]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Writing with Collaborative Hypertext: Analysis and Modeling , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[33]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[34]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization , 2000, AVI '00.

[35]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Incremental formalization with the hyper-object substrate , 1999, TOIS.

[36]  William J. Hunter,et al.  A Framework for Writing Process Activities. , 1990 .

[37]  No Arthur,et al.  New technology , 1989, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[38]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  Lib Gibson,et al.  New problems , 1973, APLQ.

[41]  Koichi Hori,et al.  An information management system with the facility to support long-term creative thinking , 2009, New Generation Computing.

[42]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[43]  David Kaufer,et al.  The role of external representation in the writing process: implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools , 1989, Hypertext.

[44]  Martin H. Levinson Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1997 .

[45]  M. Sharples Cognitive Support and the Rhythm of Design , 1994 .

[46]  Noel Williams,et al.  New Technology. New Writing. New Problems , 1992 .

[47]  T. Buzan,et al.  The Mind Map Book , 1993 .

[48]  Craig Etchison Word processing: A helpful tool for basic writers , 1989 .

[49]  John Willinsky,et al.  When University Students Word Process Their Assignments , 1989 .

[50]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[51]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation , 2000, TCHI.

[52]  Shingo Takada,et al.  Two-Dimensional Positioning as a Means to Represent Strategic Knowledge in Design , 1999 .

[53]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Why Are Some Diagrams Easier to Work With? : Effects of Diagrammatic Representation on the Cognitive Integration Process of Systems Analysis and Design , 1999 .

[54]  J. Cusack Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1994 .

[55]  D. Galbraith,et al.  Knowing What to Write , 1999 .

[56]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[57]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  From documents to discourse: shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing , 1998, CHI.

[58]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .