Beyond purchasing: Electric vehicle adoption motivation and consistent sustainable energy behaviour in The Netherlands

Abstract Adoption of smart energy technologies, such as electric vehicles (EVs), can significantly reduce fossil energy use, provided that adopters of an EV also use the EV in a sustainable way. Hence, it is key to understand which factors affect the likelihood that the adoption of EVs promotes the sustainable use of EVs, and promote consistent sustainable energy behaviours. We argue that the motivation to adopt an EV plays a key role in this respect. When people adopt an EV for environmental reasons, this will signal that they are a pro-environmental person, thereby strengthening environmental self-identity and promoting consistent sustainable energy behaviours. We conducted two cross-sectional studies among EV adopters to test our reasoning. As expected, the more people adopted an EV for environmental reasons, the stronger their environmental self-identity, in turn increasing the likelihood that they engaged in other sustainable energy behaviours. In contrast, adopting an EV for financial or technological reasons was not consistently related to environmental self-identity and sustainable energy behaviours. These results suggest that the motivation for adopting an EV is crucial for the likelihood that people engage in sustainable energy behaviour consistently, which is key to realise a sustainable energy transition.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[3]  L. Steg,et al.  It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour , 2013 .

[4]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives , 2014 .

[5]  Kimberly S. Wolske,et al.  Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change: Opportunities through consumer behavior , 2018 .

[6]  L. Steg,et al.  Follow the signal : When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are , 2014 .

[7]  L. Steg,et al.  Why Acting Environmentally-Friendly Feels Good: Exploring the Role of Self-Image , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[8]  L. Steg,et al.  The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour , 2013 .

[9]  L. Steg,et al.  Acting green elicits a literal warm glow , 2015 .

[10]  W. Poortinga,et al.  The Welsh Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge and behavioural spillover , 2016 .

[11]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects , 2013 .

[12]  Linda Steg,et al.  Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters , 2015 .

[14]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour , 2013 .

[15]  Gesche M. Huebner,et al.  Tailored emails prompt electric vehicle owners to engage with tariff switching information , 2017, Nature Energy.

[16]  Wesley P. Schultz,et al.  Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda , 2017 .

[17]  Liam David Graham Smith,et al.  You did, so you can and you will: Self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-environmental behaviour , 2016 .

[18]  L. Steg,et al.  I Am What I Am, by Looking Past the Present , 2012 .

[19]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework , 2014 .

[20]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[21]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2009 .

[22]  S. Borenstein.  The Private and Public Economics of Renewable Electricity Generation , 2011 .

[23]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Behavioural Spillover in the Environmental Domain: An Intervention Study , 2014 .

[24]  R. Eisinga,et al.  The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[25]  A. Cavoukian,et al.  SmartPrivacy for the Smart Grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation , 2010 .

[26]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  A Transformative Practice? Meaning, Competence, and Material Aspects of Driving Electric Cars in Norway , 2014 .

[27]  John Thøgersen,et al.  A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior , 2004 .

[28]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour , 2003 .

[29]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[30]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing , 2015 .

[31]  Linda Steg,et al.  The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model , 2016 .

[32]  P. Plötz,et al.  Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany , 2014 .

[33]  Verena Tiefenbeck,et al.  For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign , 2013 .

[34]  Linda Steg,et al.  The importance of instrumental, symbolic, and environmental attributes for the adoption of smart energy systems , 2016 .

[35]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Towards smart grids: Identifying the risks that arise from the integration of energy and transport supply chains , 2014 .

[36]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables , 1970 .

[37]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours , 2010 .

[38]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .