ns-2 vs. OPNET: a comparative study of the IEEE 802.11e technology on MANET environments

In this work we present the results of a comparative study between two well-known network simulators: ns-2 and OP-NET Modeler. In particular, we focus on a performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.11e technology on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) in both stationary and mobile scenarios. The paper describes the tested scenarios in detail, and discusses simulation results obtained with OPNET Modeler, comparing them with those obtained with ns-2. The performance of IEEE 802.11e in the presence of legacy IEEE 802.11 stations is also analyzed. Due to the significant differences between both simulators, we enumerate those changes required so as to make results obtained via both simulators comparable. The results that have been reached support the conclusion that the behavior of both simulators is quite similar in general.

[1]  B. Hechenleitner,et al.  On Shortcomings of the ns-2 Random Number Generator , 2002 .

[2]  André Schiper,et al.  On the accuracy of MANET simulators , 2002, POMC '02.

[3]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[4]  Tracy Camp,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Random Waypoint Simulations Through Steady-State Initialization , 2004 .

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Pietro Manzoni,et al.  On the interaction between IEEE 802.11e and routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc network , 2005, 13th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing.

[7]  Pietro Manzoni,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of IEEE 802.11e in multi-hop mobile network environments , 2004, The IEEE Computer Society's 12th Annual International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, 2004. (MASCOTS 2004). Proceedings..

[8]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[9]  M. Malowidzki.  Network Simulators: a Developer's Perspective , .

[10]  David M. Nicol,et al.  Simulation of large scale networks II: modeling and simulation best practices for wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, WSC '03.

[11]  Martin Fleury,et al.  Modeler and Ns-2 : Comparing the Accuracy Of Network Simulators for Packet-Level Analysis using a Network Testbed , 2003 .

[12]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Random waypoint considered harmful , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[13]  Tracy Camp,et al.  MANET simulation studies: the incredibles , 2005, MOCO.

[14]  Markus Becker,et al.  Extending OPNET Modeler with External Pseudo Random Number Generators and Statistical Evaluation by the Limited Relative Error Algorithm , 2007 .

[15]  Douglas J. Morrice,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Best Practices for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[16]  Francesco Potorti,et al.  A tool for packaging and exchanging simulation results , 2006, valuetools '06.

[17]  Todd R. Andel,et al.  On the credibility of manet simulations , 2006, Computer.