Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes toward Animals

AbstractTo examine the relationship among gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals, 144 male and 222 female college students were administered the Bem Sex Role Inventory, a Likert-scale questionnaire designed to assess attitudes toward animal welfare issues, and a measure of perceived comfort touching animals of a variety of species. There were significant gender differences on all of the animal-related measures with the exception of self-reported comfort touching positively perceived animals. Gender and the expressive (feminine) dimension of sex role orientation accounted for a significant proportion of the variation in attitudes toward animal welfare issues and comfort with other species. Correlations between the masculine and feminine dimensions of sex role orientation were related in opposite directions on all animal attitude measures.

[1]  G. Chelune,et al.  Level versus pattern of neuropsychological performance among schizophrenic and diffusely brain-damaged patients. , 1979, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  A. Hills.  The Relationship between Thing-Person Orientation and the Perception of Animals , 1989 .

[3]  J. Beckstead,et al.  Attitudes toward animal research. , 1988 .

[4]  A. Bowd.  Fears and Understanding of Animals in Middle Childhood , 1984 .

[5]  L. Ollila.  Gender-Related Preferences for the Choice of Particular Animals as Writing Topics in Grade 1. , 1989 .

[6]  A. H. Kidd,et al.  Factors in Children's Attitudes toward Pets , 1990, Psychological reports.

[7]  D. Taylor.  Concurrent validity of the bem sex role inventory: A person-environment approach , 1984 .

[8]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Masculine Instrumentality and Feminine Expressiveness: Their Relationships with Sex Role Attitudes and Behaviors , 1980 .

[9]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  On assessing “androgyny” , 1979 .

[10]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities. , 1988 .

[12]  E. Lenney.  Androgyny: Some audacious assertions toward its coming of age , 1979 .

[13]  H. Herzog.  “The Movement Is My Life”: The Psychology of Animal Rights Activism , 1993 .

[14]  Julia A. Nielsen,et al.  Behavior of Young Children in the Presence of Different Kinds of Animals , 1989 .

[15]  H. Martin,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validity of selected masculinity and femininity scales , 1984 .

[16]  L. J. Walker,et al.  Experiential and Cognitive Sources of Moral Development in Adulthood , 1986 .

[17]  R. Christensen.  ATTITUDES, KNOWLEDGE, AND BEHAVIORS TOWARD WILDLIFE AS AFFECTED BY GENDER , 1987 .

[18]  Lawrence J. Walker,et al.  Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. , 1984 .

[19]  A. Myers,et al.  Utility of the masculinity–femininity construct: Comparison of traditional and androgyny approaches. , 1982 .

[20]  Androgyny and Sex Role Measurement. A Personal Construct Approach , 1986 .

[21]  S. Bem,et al.  Bem sex-role inventory : professional manual , 1981 .

[22]  F. Wilson,et al.  Concurrent validity of four androgyny instruments , 1984 .

[23]  S. Bem,et al.  On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. , 1977, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[24]  S. Bem,et al.  Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. , 1975 .

[25]  R. Poresky.  Analyzing Human-Animal Relationship Measures , 1989 .

[26]  N. Lyons.  Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality. , 1983 .

[27]  A. Fogel,et al.  Children's Ideas about Animal Young and their Care: A Reassessment of Gender Differences in the Development of Nurturance , 1989 .