Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality

Whereas scholars have historically treated routines and creativity as contradictory concepts, I adopt a dynamic ontology of routines that recasts them as a duality. Using data from a case study at a midsize retail organization, I theorize that artifacts, auxiliary routines, and external comparisons shape the enactment of routines that accomplish seemingly contradictory patterns of novelty and familiarity. From this analysis, I theorize two mechanisms—personalizing and depersonalizing—to explain how enacting a routine can produce patterns that allow an organization to achieve recognizable creativity on an ongoing basis. The findings contribute to research by theorizing the routine as a central concept that explains the ongoing accomplishment of recognizable creativity. By theorizing routines as an inherent part of creativity, and creativity as an inherent part of routines, I shift the way that scholars have traditionally viewed how organizations foster creativity among employees. For routine dynamics research, this study elaborates on the agency of routine actors who skillfully integrate their idiosyncratic backgrounds and experiences with the routine in ways that create complex patterns. It also unpacks the pivotal role of broader contexts and nonroutine actors in shaping routines.

[1]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[2]  H. Greve.  Organizational Routines and Performance Feedback , 2008 .

[3]  Scott Sonenshein.  How Organizations Foster the Creative Use of Resources , 2014 .

[4]  Markus C. Becker.  Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[5]  C. Shalley,et al.  Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: the role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  Scott F. Turner,et al.  A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Luciana D'Adderio.  The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics , 2008 .

[8]  J. George,et al.  Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence , 2003 .

[9]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[10]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Mike Hales,et al.  The Practice of Routines and Representations in Design and Development , 2009 .

[12]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives , 2011 .

[13]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support , 2004 .

[14]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[15]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .

[16]  Michel Anteby,et al.  Collective Memory Meets Organizational Identity: Remembering to Forget in a Firm's Rhetorical History , 2012 .

[17]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[18]  U. Witt.  Novelty and the bounds of unknowledge in economics , 2009 .

[19]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[20]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: the influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines , 2003 .

[21]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[22]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[23]  Alexandra Michel,et al.  The Mutual Constitution of Persons and Organizations: An Ontological Perspective on Organizational Change , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[24]  M. Feldman,et al.  Routines as a Source of Change in Organizational Schemata: The Role of Trial-and-Error Learning , 2011 .

[25]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routines Transfer , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[30]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[31]  J. George.  9 Creativity in Organizations , 2007 .

[32]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Innovation Routines: Exploring the Role of Procedures and Stable Behaviour Patterns in Innovation , 2009 .

[33]  Gregory J. Feist.  A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[35]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville.  The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[37]  S. Harvey.  Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity , 2014 .

[38]  C. Salvato.  The Role of Micro‐Strategies in the Engineering of Firm Evolution , 2003 .

[39]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Enhancing Creativity Through "Mindless" Work: A Framework of Workday Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Ken Kamoche,et al.  Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation , 2001 .

[41]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[42]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[43]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[44]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 2013 .

[45]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Assessing creativity in hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments , 2003 .

[46]  Michael J. Fern,et al.  Examining the Stability and Variability of Routine Performances: The Effects of Experience and Context Change , 2012 .

[47]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[48]  A. Styhre.  Organization Creativity and the Empiricist Image of Novelty , 2006 .

[49]  J. Morse.  Sampling in Grounded Theory , 2007 .

[50]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .