An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion.

PURPOSE The frequency-doubling illusion is an apparent doubling of spatial frequency when a sinusoidal grating is modulated rapidly in temporal counterphase. It has been proposed that the illusion arises from a spatially nonlinear ganglion cell class. The current study reexamines this possibility and investigates other mechanisms that may underlie the illusion. METHODS Responses of macaque magnocellular (MC) retinal ganglion cells were recorded to counterphase-modulated sinusoidal gratings of various spatial frequencies, and linearity of spatial summation was assessed. Human psychophysical thresholds were measured for a variety of phase discrimination and matching tasks. RESULTS Consistent with lateral geniculate recordings reported by other authors, no evidence was found of a separate nonlinear (M(y)) MC cell class. The small, spatially nonlinear responses found were least at the low spatial frequencies used in clinical testing. Further analysis showed that no spatially modulated signal can be expected from the nonlinear response of a ganglion cell; the nonlinearity of spatial summation gives a doubled response in time but not across space. Psychophysical performance was consistent with an inability to distinguish the temporal phase of counterphase-modulated gratings when the illusion occurs. From 4 to 40 Hz, the zero-crossings of the modulated sinusoidal grating provided a spatial cue and were matched to comparison patterns at twice the stimulus spatial frequency. CONCLUSIONS These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that spatially nonlinear (M(y)) retinal ganglion cells are the physiological substrate of the frequency-doubling illusion. A cortical loss of temporal phase discrimination may be the principle cause of the illusion.

[1]  D. H. Kelly Frequency Doubling in Visual Responses , 1966 .

[2]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  W Richards,et al.  Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central? , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  C. Tyler Observations on Spatial-Frequency Doubling , 1974, Perception.

[5]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Shapley,et al.  Receptive field mechanisms of cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells , 1979, The Journal of general physiology.

[8]  D H Kelly,et al.  Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  A. Parker Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Shapley,et al.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M Sur,et al.  Linear and nonlinear W-cells in C-laminae of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Effects of Temporal Modulation on the Perceived Spatial Structure of Sine-Wave Gratings , 1983, Perception.

[13]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Organization and post‐natal development of the monkey's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Visual resolution of macaque retinal ganglion cells. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Bb Lee,et al.  Nonlinear summation of M- and L-cone inputs to phasic retinal ganglion cells of the macaque , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  V. Perry,et al.  The topography of magnocellular projecting ganglion cells (M-ganglion cells) in the primate retina , 1991, Neuroscience.

[18]  Ted Maddess,et al.  Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma , 1992 .

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Johnson,et al.  Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  A. James,et al.  Evidence for spatial aliasing effects in the Y-like cells of the magnocellular visual pathway , 1998, Vision Research.

[22]  A. James,et al.  Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion , 1999, Vision Research.

[23]  T. Maddess,et al.  Apparent fineness of stationary compound gratings , 1999, Vision Research.

[24]  Jonathan D Victor,et al.  Comparison of thresholds for high-speed drifting vernier and a matched temporal phase-discrimination task , 2000, Vision Research.

[25]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  R. Shapley,et al.  Is there an effect of monocular deprivation on the proportions of X and Y cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Robert Shapley,et al.  Spatial properties of X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat and conduction velocities of their inputs , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.