Analytical study of gyrophase, pitch angle, and normal speed of particles leaving an ideal magnetohydrodynamic discontinuity surface.

Particle populations that have velocity distributions with only a small spread of gyrophase angles are commonly observed in the vicinity of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) discontinuity surfaces such as collisionless shocks. Previous theoretical particle trajectory studies have concentrated on ion behavior at an ideal planar Earth's bow shock and have either assumed that a gyrotropic incident initial velocity distribution is reflected at the surface or instead focused on unique fixed initial gyrophase and pitch angle values specified by the generation mechanism assumed for the particle. In this analytical study of trajectories of particles departing an ideal planar MHD surface we demonstrate that a particle's initial gyrophase and pitch angle determine completely whether it will escape the surface or return to it, regardless of its initial energy. We identify the region in initial gyrophase-pitch angle space which leads to trajectories that return to the surface of the discontinuity. The speed normal to the surface of a returning particle, which can affect its ability to traverse the discontinuity, is shown to increase or decrease compared to its initial value according only to the orientation of its guiding-center motion in the frame of reference in which the discontinuity is at rest and the incoming plasma flow is aligned with the constant magnetic field. The dependence of our results on the direction of the upstream magnetic field is illustrated. Our general analytical results are discussed in the context of observations at the Earth's bow shock.

[1]  G. Murphy,et al.  Collisionless Shocks , 2022, Basic Space Plasma Physics.

[2]  A. Runov,et al.  On the Kinetic Nature of Solar Wind Discontinuities , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[3]  R. Erdélyi,et al.  Propagation of leaky surface waves on contact magnetohydrodynamic discontinuities in incompressible plasmas , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[4]  A. Du,et al.  Magnetosheath Reconnection Before Magnetopause Reconnection Driven by Interplanetary Tangential Discontinuity: A Three‐Dimensional Global Hybrid Simulation With Oblique Interplanetary Magnetic Field , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[5]  M. Echim,et al.  Tangential deflection and formation of counterstreaming flows at the impact of a plasma jet on a tangential discontinuity , 2017, 1706.09635.

[6]  M. Gedalin Transmitted, reflected, quasi‐reflected, and multiply reflected ions in low‐Mach number shocks , 2016 .

[7]  Klaus Aachen Introduction To Space Physics , 2016 .

[8]  M. Gedalin Collisionless relaxation of non-gyrotropic downstream ion distributions: dependence on shock parameters , 2015 .

[9]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  THEMIS observations of tangential discontinuity‐driven foreshock bubbles , 2015 .

[10]  C. Mazelle,et al.  On the Field‐Aligned Beam Thermal Energy , 2013 .

[11]  M. Thomsen Upstream Suprathermal Ions , 2013 .

[12]  A. E. Robson,et al.  Ion reflection, gyration, and dissipation at supercritical shocks , 2013 .

[13]  E. Möbius,et al.  Ion Acceleration at the Earth’s Bow Shock , 2012 .

[14]  C. Russell,et al.  Collisionless relaxation of ion distributions downstream of laminar quasi-perpendicular shocks , 2009 .

[15]  M. Balikhin,et al.  Distribution of escaping ions produced by non‐specular reflection at the stationary quasi‐perpendicular shock front , 2008 .

[16]  C. Mazelle,et al.  Evidence for a high-energy tail associated with foreshock field-aligned beams , 2007 .

[17]  A. Balogh,et al.  Quasi-perpendicular Shock Structure and Processes , 2005 .

[18]  Yuika Saito,et al.  Field-aligned beam observations at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock : Generation and shock angle dependence , 2005 .

[19]  T. Horbury,et al.  On the origin of field-aligned beams at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock: multi-spacecraft observations by Cluster , 2004 .

[20]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Simultaneous observations of field-aligned beams and gyrating ions in the terrestrial foreshock , 2004 .

[21]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Production of gyrating ions from nonlinear wave-particle interaction upstream from the Earth's bow shock: A case study from Cluster-CIS , 2003 .

[22]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  Bow shock specularly reflected ions in the presence of low-frequency electromagnetic waves: a case study , 2002 .

[23]  M. Ashour‐Abdalla,et al.  Wave-Particle Interactions Associated with Nongyrotropic Distribution Functions: A Hybrid Simulation Study , 2002 .

[24]  T. Horbury,et al.  Observations of the spatial and temporal structure of field-aligned beam and gyrating ring distributions at the quasi-perpendicular bow shock with Cluster CIS , 2001 .

[25]  G. Parks,et al.  Three‐dimensional observations of gyrating ion distributions far upstream from the Earth's bow shock and their association with low‐frequency waves , 2001 .

[26]  A. Brinca A first assessment of the free energy in nongyrotropic plasmas , 2000 .

[27]  M. Gedalin Transmitted ions and ion heating in nearly perpendicular low-Mach number shocks , 1996 .

[28]  B. Anderson,et al.  Ion anisotropies in the magnetosheath , 1993 .

[29]  P. A. Craven Physics of Space Plasmas: An introduction , 1992 .

[30]  M. Thomsen,et al.  He2+ in field‐aligned beams: ISEE results , 1992 .

[31]  S. Gary,et al.  Electromagnetic ion/ion instabilities and their consequences in space plasmas: A review , 1991 .

[32]  H. Lühr,et al.  Ion thermalization in quasi-perpendicular shocks involving reflected ions , 1990 .

[33]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Ion distributions and thermalization at perpendicular and quasi‐perpendicular supercritical collisionless shocks , 1989 .

[34]  L. Kistler,et al.  Protons and alpha particles in field-aligned beams upstream of the bow shock , 1988 .

[35]  C. Russell,et al.  The phase relationship between gyrophase-bunched ions and MHD-like waves. [upstream from earth's bow shock] , 1986 .

[36]  M. Hoshino,et al.  Numerical study of the upstream wave excitation mechanism: 1. Nonlinear phase bunching of beam ions , 1985 .

[37]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The dynamics and upstream distributions of ions reflected at the Earth's bow shock , 1984 .

[38]  C. Russell,et al.  A comparison of specularly reflected gyrating ion orbits with observed shock foot thicknesses. [in earth's bow shock , 1984 .

[39]  B. Coppi,et al.  Physics of Space Plasmas , 1984 .

[40]  B. Mauk,et al.  Upstream gyrophase bunched ions: A mechanism for creation at the bow shook and the growth of velocity space structure through gyrophase mixing , 1983 .

[41]  C. Russell,et al.  Evolution of ion distributions across the nearly perpendicular bow shock: Specularly and non‐specularly reflected‐gyrating ions , 1983 .

[42]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Ions upstream of the Earth's bow shock: A theoretical comparison of alternative source populations , 1983 .

[43]  B. Mauk,et al.  Non‐E × B ordered ion beams upstream of the Earth's bow shock , 1981 .

[44]  Edward Teller,et al.  Magneto-Hydrodynamic Shocks , 1950 .