Response to eculizumab in patients with myasthenia gravis recently treated with chronic IVIg: a subgroup analysis of REGAIN and its open-label extension study

Background: In the phase III eculizumab for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis REGAIN study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01997229] and its open-label extension (OLE) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624], patients with treatment-refractory antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis had clinically meaningful improvements with eculizumab versus placebo. This subgroup analysis evaluated data from patients with a recent history of chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) use before study entry. Methods: The subgroup comprised patients who had received IVIg at least four times in 1 year, with at least one IVIg treatment cycle during the 6 months before the first REGAIN study dose. Data from REGAIN and the OLE were analyzed. Response to eculizumab versus placebo was assessed using four validated, disease-specific measures. Incidences of exacerbations and safety endpoints were recorded. Results: The subgroup had similar patient and disease characteristics as the overall REGAIN population. Clinical assessments showed sustained eculizumab efficacy during REGAIN and the OLE over 18 months. Patients receiving placebo in REGAIN experienced rapid improvements in assessment scores when treated with eculizumab in the OLE. There was a lower rate of disease exacerbations with eculizumab than with placebo during REGAIN, and eculizumab was well tolerated. Conclusion: Eculizumab treatment, compared with placebo, results in meaningful clinical improvements and fewer disease exacerbations for patients who previously received chronic IVIg. Trial registration: REGAIN [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01997229]; REGAIN open-label extension [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624].

[1]  T. Levine Safety of an Abbreviated Transition Period When Switching From Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Eculizumab in Patients with Treatment-Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Series , 2019, The American journal of case reports.

[2]  A. Exuzides,et al.  Healthcare resource utilization by patients with treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis in England , 2019, Journal of medical economics.

[3]  M. Benatar,et al.  Long‐term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis , 2019, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  N. Engel-Nitz,et al.  Burden of illness in patients with treatment refractory myasthenia gravis , 2018, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  G. L. Masson,et al.  Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. , 2017, The Lancet. Neurology.

[6]  M. Benatar,et al.  International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis , 2016, Neurology.

[7]  J. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Patients , 2013, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[8]  Richard J. Jones,et al.  Rebooting the Immune System with High‐Dose Cyclophosphamide for Treatment of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Suarez,et al.  Myasthenia Gravis Crisis , 2008, Southern medical journal.

[10]  M. Dalakas,et al.  High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin exerts its beneficial effect in patients with dermatomyositis by blocking endomysial deposition of activated complement fragments. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.