Evaluation of companding-based spectral enhancement using simulated cochlear-implant processing.

This study tested a time-domain spectral enhancement algorithm that was recently proposed by Turicchia and Sarpeshkar [IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc. 13, 243-253 (2005)]. The algorithm uses a filter bank, with each filter channel comprising broadly tuned amplitude compression, followed by more narrowly tuned expansion (companding). Normal-hearing listeners were tested in their ability to recognize sentences processed through a noise-excited envelope vocoder that simulates aspects of cochlear-implant processing. The sentences were presented in a steady background noise at signal-to-noise ratios of 0, 3, and 6 dB and were either passed directly through an envelope vocoder, or were first processed by the companding algorithm. Using an eight-channel envelope vocoder, companding produced small but significant improvements in speech reception. Parametric variations of the companding algorithm showed that the improvement in intelligibility was robust to changes in filter tuning, whereas decreases in the time constants resulted in a decrease in intelligibility. Companding continued to provide a benefit when the number of vocoder frequency channels was increased to sixteen. When integrated within a sixteen-channel cochlear-implant simulator, companding also led to significant improvements in sentence recognition. Thus, companding may represent a readily implementable way to provide some speech recognition benefits to current cochlear-implant users.

[1]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  A bio-inspired companding strategy for spectral enhancement , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing.

[3]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level , 1990, Hearing Research.

[5]  Fa-Long Luo,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement: Algorithms and comparisons , 2003, Speech Commun..

[6]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[7]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  M F Dorman,et al.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A M Simpson,et al.  Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[14]  P C Loizou,et al.  Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[17]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Peggy B. Nelson,et al.  Enhancement of spectral contrast in speech for hearing impaired listeners , 1999, NSIP.

[19]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  A companding front end for noise-robust automatic speech recognition , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[20]  T Houtgast,et al.  A speech enhancement scheme incorporating spectral expansion evaluated with simulated loss of frequency selectivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Estimates of Human Cochlear Tuning at Low Levels Using Forward and Simultaneous Masking , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[25]  Peggy B Nelson,et al.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[27]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral feature enhancement for people with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on speech intelligibility and quality. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.