Capturing reflexivity modes in IS: A critical realist approach

Critical realism is a subject of growing interest in the IS literature. This article aims at implementing a critical realist framework: Archer [Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press] internal conversation theory. As a contemporary sociologist, Archer suggests both a general vision of social practice and a typology of reflexivity modes. Her multilayered framework could be extremely useful in overcoming a current limitation in IS: the weakness of reflexivity modeling. Indeed, though much research sheds light on the structure-action relationship, it does not illuminate users' biographical realms and reflexivities. In consequence, some genuine motives in ICT-related practices remain poorly understood. To address this deficiency, this article applies Archer's framework to an IS environment through a meta-analysis of interviews. Results partially confirm the relevance of internal conversation theory and its potential added value to the study of ICT-mediated interactions. A further reflexivity mode and possible re-organizations of the Archer framework are also proposed.

[1]  Emmanuel Monod,et al.  Einstein, Heisenberg, Kant: methodological distinction and conditions of possibilities , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[2]  Rom Harré,et al.  The analysis of action : recent theoretical and empirical advances , 1982 .

[3]  Paul Morton Using Critical Realism to Explain Strategic Information Systems Planning , 2006 .

[4]  S. Fleetwood Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2005 .

[5]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[8]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[9]  Douglas FOUR CONCEPTS OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE , 1989 .

[10]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[13]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[14]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[15]  Paul Jackson,et al.  Making the Case for Critical Realism: Examining the Implementation of Automated Performance Management Systems , 2007, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[16]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[17]  B. Latour Social Theory and the Study of Computerized Work Sites , 1996 .

[18]  John Mingers,et al.  Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[19]  Steve Fuller,et al.  Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies , 1993 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[21]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[22]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[23]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[24]  Rob Stones,et al.  Refusing the Realism—Structuration Divide , 2001 .

[25]  Mustafa Emirbayer What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[26]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[27]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[28]  Béatrice Cahour,et al.  Conscience périphérique et travail coopératif dans un café-restaurant , 2005 .

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[30]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  M. Archer Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory , 1996 .

[32]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[33]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[34]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[35]  P. Bagguley Reflexivity Contra Structuration , 2003 .

[36]  B. Latour Aramis ou L'amour des techniques , 1992 .

[37]  Phil Johnson,et al.  Reflexivity in Management Research , 2003 .

[38]  F. D. Singly,et al.  Le récit de vie , 2005 .

[39]  M. Archer Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation , 2003 .

[40]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The evolution of institutional economics : agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism , 2004 .

[41]  A. Mutch Constraints on the internal conversation: Margaret Archer and the Structural Shaping of thought , 2004 .

[42]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[43]  J. Piaget,et al.  LA NAISSANCE DE L'INTELLIGENCE CHEZ L'INFANT , 1939 .

[44]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[45]  A. Mutch Reflexivity and the Institutional Entrepreneur: A Historical Exploration , 2007 .

[46]  Norbert Alter,et al.  L'innovation ordinaire , 2010 .

[47]  F. Vandenberghe,et al.  Book Review: The Archers , 2005 .

[48]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[49]  Mark Thompson,et al.  Confessions of an IS Consultant or the Limitations of Structuration Theory , 2004 .

[50]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[51]  Philip J. Dobson The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[52]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[53]  J. Stoelhorst The evolution of institutional economics: Agency, structure and darwinism in american institutionalism , 2007 .

[54]  Bruno Latour,et al.  La science telle qu'elle se fait : anthologie de la sociologie des sciences de langue anglaise , 1991 .

[55]  Heinz K. Klein,et al.  Seeking the new and the critical in critical realism: déjà vu? , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[56]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[57]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  P. Bourdieu The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[59]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Frame of analysis , 1995 .

[61]  Matthew Adams,et al.  Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: , 2006 .

[62]  Karen Locke,et al.  Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years? , 1996 .

[64]  M. Crozier,et al.  L' acteur et le systeme , 1978 .

[65]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information Technology and Social Transformation: GIS for Forestry Management in India , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[66]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[67]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[68]  M. Archer Being Human: The Problem of Agency , 2000 .

[69]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[70]  Teresa Brannick,et al.  Reflexivity in Management and Business Research: What Do We Mean? , 2006 .

[71]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..