Structural controllability of unidirectional bipartite networks

The interactions between fundamental life molecules, people and social organisations build complex architectures that often result in undesired behaviours. Despite all of the advances made in our understanding of network structures over the past decade, similar progress has not been achieved in the controllability of real-world networks. In particular, an analytical framework to address the controllability of bipartite networks is still absent. Here, we present a dominating set (DS)-based approach to bipartite network controllability that identifies the topologies that are relatively easy to control with the minimum number of driver nodes. Our theoretical calculations, assisted by computer simulations and an evaluation of real-world networks offer a promising framework to control unidirectional bipartite networks. Our analysis should open a new approach to reverting the undesired behaviours in unidirectional bipartite networks at will.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Controllability analysis of networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  B. Derudder,et al.  World City Network: A global urban analysis , 2003 .

[5]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network medicine : a network-based approach to human disease , 2010 .

[6]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems , 1973, STOC.

[8]  Peter J. Slater,et al.  Fundamentals of domination in graphs , 1998, Pure and applied mathematics.

[9]  L. Lai,et al.  Finding multiple target optimal intervention in disease-related molecular network , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Ching-tai Lin Structural controllability , 1974 .

[11]  M. Yagiura,et al.  RELAXATION HEURISTICS FOR THE SET COVERING PROBLEM( the 50th Anniversary of the Operations Research Society of Japan) , 2007 .

[12]  Vasek Chvátal,et al.  A Greedy Heuristic for the Set-Covering Problem , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The human disease network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Jean-Marc Schwartz,et al.  A global view of drug-therapy interactions , 2007, BMC pharmacology.

[15]  István A. Kovács,et al.  Drug-therapy networks and the prediction of novel drug targets , 2008, Journal of biology.

[16]  M. Yagiura,et al.  RELAXATION HEURISTICS FOR THE SET COVERING PROBLEM , 2007 .

[17]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Controlling edge dynamics in complex networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[18]  Péter Csermely,et al.  The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[19]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[21]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Controllability of Multi-Agent Systems from a Graph-Theoretic Perspective , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[22]  F. Müller,et al.  Few inputs can reprogram biological networks , 2011, Nature.

[23]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  HUMAN DISEASE , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[24]  Marek Chrobak,et al.  Probe selection algorithms with applications in the analysis of microbial communities , 2001, ISMB.

[25]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks , 2009, Nature.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[27]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[28]  Tore Opsahl Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Guangming Xie,et al.  Controllability of a Leader–Follower Dynamic Network With Switching Topology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[30]  Alexei Vazquez,et al.  Optimal drug combinations and minimal hitting sets , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[31]  Carlo Mannino,et al.  Optimization Problems and Models for Planning Cellular Networks , 2006, Handbook of Optimization in Telecommunications.

[32]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  On the Effectiveness of Set Covering Formulations for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows , 1997, Oper. Res..

[33]  Adilson E Motter,et al.  Improved network performance via antagonism: From synthetic rescues to multi-drug combinations , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[34]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[35]  László Lovász,et al.  On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers , 1975, Discret. Math..

[36]  Acknowledgments , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[37]  M. Ng,et al.  Control of Boolean networks: hardness results and algorithms for tree structured networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  E. Balas,et al.  Set Partitioning: A survey , 1976 .

[39]  Adilson E. Motter,et al.  Slave nodes and the controllability of metabolic networks , 2009, 0911.5518.

[40]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  Dominating scale-free networks with variable scaling exponent: heterogeneous networks are not difficult to control , 2012 .