Effect of ultrasound transducer frequency on the appearance of the fetal bowel.

We evaluated how ultrasound transducer frequency affected the appearance of the fetal bowel. One hundred women with singleton pregnancies, who were undergoing routine ultrasonographic examination, were assessed at a single institution. Patients with known fetal anomalies, abnormal biochemical screening results, or a history of cystic fibrosis were excluded. Images of the fetal abdomen were obtained in all patients using a single multi‐Hertz transducer, with transducer frequencies set at 5 MHz and 8 MHz. Images were read separately by two radiologists, blinded to patient name and transducer frequency. Observers rated the presence or absence of echogenic bowel, defined as bowel with echogenicity greater than or equal to that of adjacent bone. Using the 8 MHz frequency, the radiologists interpreted 31% of the cases as having echogenic bowel, whereas using the 5 MHz frequency, the radiologists interpreted only 3% of the cases as having echogenic bowel (P<0.0001). A fetus was 10 times as likely to be given a diagnosis of echogenic bowel by both observers when the 8 MHz transducer was used than when the 5 MHz transducer was used by one observer (relative risk 10, 95% CI 3‐11). Furthermore, using the 8 MHz frequency transducer, at least one of the radiologists interpreted echogenic bowel in 62% of the cases. We concluded that echogenic fetal bowel is a very common observation when imaging is performed with an 8 MHz transducer, and thus echogenic bowel diagnosed with an 8 MHz transducer is unlikely to reflect underlying abnormality. Identification of echogenic bowel with an 8 MHz transducer should not prompt further testing.

[1]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Sonographic borderlands in the fetal abdomen. , 1998, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[2]  J. Langer,et al.  Bowel abnormalities in the fetus--correlation of prenatal ultrasonographic findings with outcome. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  J. Hassan,et al.  Is isolated second‐trimester hyperechogenic bowel a predictor of suboptimal fetal growth? , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[4]  R. Slotnick,et al.  Prognostic implications of fetal echogenic bowel , 1996, The Lancet.

[5]  N. Fisk,et al.  Prevalence of Cystic Fibrosis Mutations in Pregnancies With Fetal Echogenic Bowel , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  R. Tamura,et al.  Isolated hyperechoic fetal bowel: significance and implications for management. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  N. Fisk,et al.  Fetal Hyperechogenic Bowel Following Intra‐Amniotic Bleeding , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Estroff,et al.  Is Fetal Hyperechoic Bowel on Second‐Trimester Sonogram an Indication for Amniocentesis? , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  R. Sanders,et al.  Increased echogenicity in the fetal abdomen: use of DNA analysis to establish a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Echogenic fetal bowel during the second trimester: clinical importance. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  J. Dicke,et al.  Sonographically Detected Hyperechoic Fetal Bowel: Significance and Implications for Pregnancy Management , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  G. Leopold,et al.  Second-trimester echogenic bowel and chromosomal abnormalities. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  I. Forouzan Fetal abdominal echogenic mass: An early sign of intrauterine cytomegalovirus infection , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  B. Pletcher,et al.  INTRAUTERINE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION PRESENTING AS FETAL MECONIUM PERITONITIS , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Prenatal sonographic findings of Down syndrome: Review of 94 cases , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  A. Beaudet,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. , 1987, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  M. Reiser,et al.  Increased echogenicity in the lower fetal abdomen: a common normal variant in the second trimester. , 1986, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  G. Szeifert,et al.  Early prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis by ultrasound , 1985, Clinical genetics.

[19]  C. Buys,et al.  PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS , 1985, The Lancet.

[20]  K. B. Porter,et al.  Fetal abdominal hyperechoic mass: diagnosis and management. , 1992, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.