MDER_A_197919 193..202

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use: https://youtu.be/2uSR1rIaqFc Objective: Active transcutaneous bone conduction devices consist of an external audio processor and an internal implant under intact skin. During the surgical procedure, it is important to verify the functionality of the implant before the surgical wound is closed. In a clinical study with the new bone conduction implant (BCI), the functionality of the implant was tested with an electric transmission test, where the output was the nasal sound pressure (NSP) recorded in the ipsilateral nostril. The same measurement was performed in all followup visits to monitor the implant's functionality and transmission to bone over time. The objective of this study was to investigate the validity of the NSP method as a tool to objectively verify the implant's performance intraoperatively, as well as to follow-up the implant's performance over time. Design: Thirteen patients with the BCI were included, and the NSP measurement was part of the clinical study protocol. The implant was electrically stimulated with an amplitudemodulated signal generator using a swept sine 0.1–10 kHz. The NSP was measured with a probe tube microphone in the ipsilateral nostril. Results: The NSP during surgery was above the noise floor for most patients within the frequency interval 0.4–5 kHz, showing NSP values for expected normal transmission of a functioning implant. Inter-subject comparison showed large variability, but follow-up results showed only minor variability within each subject. Further investigation showed that the NSP was stable over time. Conclusion: The NSP method is considered applicable to verify the implant's functionality during and after surgery. Such a method is important for implantable devices, but should be simplified and clinically adapted. Large variations between subjects were found, as well as smaller variability in intra-subject comparisons. As the NSP was found to not change significantly over time, stable transmission to bone, and implant functionality, were indicated.

[1]  Lindsey Westover,et al.  Development of a Novel Bone Conduction Verification Tool Using a Surface Microphone: Validation With Percutaneous Bone Conduction Users , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[2]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument , 2016, Hearing Research.

[3]  Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the bone conduction implant – a pilot study at 1.5 Tesla , 2015, Medical devices.

[4]  Xian Liu,et al.  Methods and Applications of Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2015 .

[5]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  Technical design of a new bone conduction implant (BCI) system , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[6]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review , 2015, Medical devices.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[9]  S. Pok,et al.  Intraoperative Measurement for a New Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  The Bone Conduction Implant—First Implantation, Surgical and Audiologic Aspects , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  A novel bone conduction implant (BCI): Engineering aspects and pre-clinical studies , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[12]  M Winter,et al.  The use of reverse transfer function (RTF) in the fitting procedure of implantable hearing devices , 2005, Cochlear implants international.

[13]  K. Wilbraham,et al.  Noise levels within the ear and post-nasal space in neonates in intensive care , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[14]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  W. B. Arndt,et al.  The relationship between nasality score values and oral and nasal sound pressure level. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  M. Ghoncheh,et al.  Development of an intraoperative evaluation method for a novel Bone Conduction Implant using nasal sound pressure , 2013 .

[17]  Bo E. V. Håkanssona.  The balanced electromagnetic separation transducer : A new bone conduction transducer , 2003 .

[18]  M Winter,et al.  MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES OF IMPLANTABLE HEARING AIDS , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[19]  B Håkansson,et al.  Skull simulator for direct bone conduction hearing devices. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.