Global implications of crop‐based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) based on purpose‐grown lignocellulosic crops can provide negative CO2 emissions to mitigate climate change, but its land requirements present a threat to biodiversity. Here, we analyse the implications of crop‐based BECCS for global terrestrial vertebrate species richness, considering both the land‐use change (LUC) required for BECCS and the climate change prevented by BECCS. LUC impacts are determined using global‐equivalent, species–area relationship‐based loss factors. We find that sequestering 0.5–5 Gtonne of CO2 per year with lignocellulosic crop‐based BECCS would require hundreds of Mha of land, and commit tens of terrestrial vertebrate species to extinction. Species loss per unit of negative emissions decreases with: (i) longer lifetimes of BECCS systems, (ii) less overall deployment of crop‐based BECCS and (iii) optimal land allocation, that is prioritizing locations with the lowest species loss per negative emission potential, rather than minimizing overall land use or prioritizing locations with the lowest biodiversity. The consequences of prevented climate change for biodiversity are based on existing climate response relationships. Our tentative comparison shows that for crop‐based BECCS considered over 30 years, LUC impacts on vertebrate species richness may outweigh the positive effects of prevented climate change. Conversely, for BECCS considered over 80 years, the positive effects of climate change mitigation on biodiversity may outweigh the negative effects of LUC. However, both effects and their interaction are highly uncertain and require further understanding, along with the analysis of additional species groups and biodiversity metrics. We conclude that factoring in biodiversity means lignocellulosic crop‐based BECCS should be used early to achieve the required mitigation over longer time periods, on optimal biomass cultivation locations, and most importantly, as little as possible where conversion of natural land is involved, looking instead to sustainably grown or residual biomass‐based feedstocks and alternative strategies for carbon dioxide removal.

[1]  Ipcc.  Global Warming of 1.5°C , 2022 .

[2]  Melissa S. Chapman,et al.  Land‐based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country , 2021, Global change biology.

[3]  N. Hanasaki,et al.  Global bioenergy with carbon capture and storage potential is largely constrained by sustainable irrigation , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[4]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Considering sustainability thresholds for BECCS in IPCC and biodiversity assessments , 2021, GCB Bioenergy.

[5]  R. Sands,et al.  Food security under high bioenergy demand toward long-term climate goals , 2020, Climatic Change.

[6]  Zoran J. N. Steinmann,et al.  The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[7]  M. Wise,et al.  EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2020, Climatic Change.

[8]  Y. Yamagata,et al.  Developing sustainable bioenergy systems with local bio-resources: cases in Asia , 2020, Sustainability Science.

[9]  A. Moilanen,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity trade-offs in the face of widespread renewable and unconventional energy development , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[10]  A. Gentile,et al.  Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances , 2020, Science.

[11]  Chris D. Jones,et al.  The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertainty , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[12]  Melissa S. Chapman,et al.  National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[13]  J. Watson,et al.  Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[14]  Mauricio M. Núñez-Regueiro,et al.  Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land‐use change and crop type , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  Robert A. Holland,et al.  The influence of the global electric power system on terrestrial biodiversity , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Integrated scenarios to support analysis of the food–energy–water nexus , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[17]  Melinda M J de Jonge,et al.  Projecting terrestrial biodiversity intactness with GLOBIO 4 , 2019, Global change biology.

[18]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal , 2019, Nature.

[19]  Zoran J. N. Steinmann,et al.  Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock—a comparison of eight integrated assessment models , 2019, Climatic Change.

[20]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Consumption-based biodiversity footprints – Do different indicators yield different results? , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[21]  Jane Elith,et al.  Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[22]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Projecting impacts of global climate and land‐use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional‐turnover modelling , 2019, Global change biology.

[23]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Better Model Transfers Require Knowledge of Mechanisms. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[25]  S. Lewis,et al.  Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon , 2019, Nature.

[26]  T. Hickler,et al.  Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Niall Mac Dowell,et al.  Investigating the BECCS resource nexus: delivering sustainable negative emissions , 2018 .

[28]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Outstanding Challenges in the Transferability of Ecological Models. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets , 2018, Nature Communications.

[30]  P. Kyle,et al.  Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[31]  William F. Lamb,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects , 2018 .

[32]  O. Edelenbosch,et al.  Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[33]  T. Brooks,et al.  Land Use Intensity-Specific Global Characterization Factors to Assess Product Biodiversity Footprints. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[35]  Julia H. Haggerty,et al.  Opportunities and Trade-offs among BECCS and the Food, Water, Energy, Biodiversity, and Social Systems Nexus at Regional Scales , 2018 .

[36]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Cornelius Senf,et al.  Agriculture rivals biomes in predicting global species richness , 2017 .

[38]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes , 2017, Science.

[40]  M. Hansen,et al.  The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013 , 2017, Science Advances.

[41]  Pete Smith,et al.  Research priorities for negative emissions , 2016 .

[42]  Cory Merow,et al.  Towards Process-based Range Modeling of Many Species. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  I. Oliver,et al.  Additive and synergistic effects of land cover, land use and climate on insect biodiversity , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal , 2016 .

[45]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry , 2016 .

[46]  A. Nordin,et al.  Comparison of carbon balances between continuous-cover and clear-cut forestry in Sweden , 2016, Ambio.

[47]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  Trade‐offs between land and water requirements for large‐scale bioenergy production , 2016 .

[48]  J. Kemper.  Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review , 2015 .

[49]  V. Dale,et al.  Ecological objectives can be achieved with wood‐derived bioenergy , 2015 .

[50]  Martin Schaefer,et al.  Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition , 2015, Ecology letters.

[51]  M. C. Urban.  Accelerating extinction risk from climate change , 2015, Science.

[52]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[53]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Risks to global biodiversity from fossil‐fuel production exceed those from biofuel production , 2015 .

[54]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene , 2014, Science.

[55]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .

[56]  André Faaij,et al.  Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review , 2014 .

[57]  T. Lenton,et al.  Scenarios for future biodiversity loss due to multiple drivers reveal conflict between mitigating climate change and preserving biodiversity , 2013 .

[58]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[59]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest , 2013, Nature.

[60]  W. Jetz,et al.  Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales , 2012, Nature.

[61]  Paul Upham,et al.  Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio-CCS) , 2011 .

[62]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[63]  C. Marshall,et al.  Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? , 2011, Nature.

[64]  Bruce B. Collette,et al.  The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates , 2010, Science.

[65]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Screening bioenergy feedstock crops to mitigate invasion risk , 2010 .

[66]  K. Lindgren,et al.  The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2010 .

[67]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[69]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[70]  K. Riahi,et al.  Managing Climate Risk , 2001, Science.

[71]  Wout Slob,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Multiplicative Models , 1994 .

[72]  P. Webley,et al.  Potential for using municipal solid waste as a resource for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2018 .

[73]  K. Eyvindson,et al.  Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia , 2018 .

[74]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation , 2018 .

[75]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[76]  Anni Arponen,et al.  Projecting Global Biodiversity Indicators under Future Development Scenarios , 2016 .

[77]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[78]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .