PurposeThe framework of life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) has been developed within the CALCAS project but the procedure on how an LCSA should be carried out is still far from standardized. The purpose of this article is to propose an approach to put the LCSA framework into practice. This approach is illustrated with an on-going case study on concrete recycling.MethodsIn the context of an EC-FP7 project on technology innovation for concrete recycling, five operational steps to implement the LCSA framework are proposed: (1) broad system definition, (2) making scenarios, (3) defining sub-questions for individual tools, (4) application of the tools and (5) interpreting the results in an LCSA framework. Focus has been put on the goal and scope definition (steps 1–3) to illustrate how to define a doable and meaningful LCSA. Steps 4–5 are not complete in the case study and are elaborated theoretically in this paper.Results and discussionThe experience from the case study shows that the operational steps are especially useful at the stage of defining the goal and scope. Breaking down the sustainability questions into different scales and different aspects gives the possibility to define the sub-questions suitable to be assessed by the individual analytical tools (e.g., LCA, LCC, SLCA, MFA, etc.). The C2CA-LCSA shows a practical approach to model the life cycle impacts of the broad system is to start by modelling the technological system at the micro level and then scale it up with the realistic scenario settings that are generated with the knowledge gained from the MFA studies at the meso-level and from the policy/economic studies at the macro level. The combined application of LCA, LCC and SLCA at the project level shows not all the cost items and only one social impact indicator can be modelled in the process-based LCA structure. Thus it is important to address the left out information at the interpretation step.ConclusionsDefining sub-questions on three different levels seems most useful to frame an LCSA study at the early stage of goal and scope definition. Although this study provides some useful steps for the operationlisation of the LCSA concept, it is clear that additional case studies are needed to move LCSA into a practical framework for the analysis of complex sustainability problems.
[1]
Gjalt Huppes,et al.
Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis
,
2010
.
[2]
Gjalt Huppes,et al.
Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future.
,
2011,
Environmental science & technology.
[3]
Robert Brodie.
INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
,
1942
.
[4]
Masahiko Hirao,et al.
A structured framework and language for scenario-based Life Cycle assessment
,
2002
.
[5]
Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.
Life Cycle Sustainability Dashboard
,
2012
.
[6]
Gjalt Huppes,et al.
Framework for scenario development in LCA
,
2000
.
[7]
Walter Kloepffer,et al.
Life cycle sustainability assessment of products
,
2008
.
[8]
David Hunkeler,et al.
Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice
,
2011
.
[9]
Pascal Lesage,et al.
Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development.
,
2009
.
[10]
R. Heijungs,et al.
Economic allocation: Examples and derived decision tree
,
2004
.
[11]
G. Finnveden,et al.
Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide
,
2006
.
[12]
J.J.J.M Goumans,et al.
Environmental Aspects Of Construction With Waste Materials
,
1994
.
[13]
Marzia Traverso,et al.
Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products
,
2011
.