CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW

A growing body of empirical literature supports key assertions of the resource-based view. However, most of this work examines the impact of firm-specific resources on the overall performance of a firm. In this paper it is argued that, in some circumstances, adopting the effectiveness of business processes as a dependent variable may be more appropriate than adopting overall firm performance as a dependent variable. This idea is tested by examining the determinants of the effectiveness of the customer service business process in a sample of North American insurance companies. Results are consistent with resource-based expectations, and they show that distinctive advantages observable at the process level are not necessarily reflected in firm level performance. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed along with a discussion of the relationship between resources and capabilities, on the one hand, and business processes, activities, and routines, on the other. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[2]  J. Wyatt.  Decision support systems. , 2000, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  R. Coff.  When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[4]  Moshe Farjoun,et al.  The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification , 1998 .

[5]  Susan S. White,et al.  Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  J. Barney,et al.  On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage , 1998 .

[7]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[8]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[9]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[10]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Leveraging processes for strategic advantage , 1995 .

[11]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[12]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[13]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria , 1994 .

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[15]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[16]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[17]  B. Schneider,et al.  A passion for service: Using content analysis to explicate service climate themes. , 1992 .

[18]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[19]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[20]  McDermott Rf,et al.  Service comes first: an interview with USAA's Robert F. McDermott. Interview by Thomas Teal. , 1991 .

[21]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[22]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[23]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. , 1991 .

[24]  R F McDermott.  Service comes first: an interview with USAA's Robert F. McDermott. Interview by Thomas Teal. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[26]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  B. Byrne.  A Primer of Lisrel: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models , 1989 .

[28]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[29]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS , 1989 .

[30]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[31]  T. Roehl,et al.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[32]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[33]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[34]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[35]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[36]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[37]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[38]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[39]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[40]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .