An agenda-setting model of electoral competition

[1]  Peter John,et al.  Agendas and Instability in American Politics , 2013 .

[2]  Pablo Amorós,et al.  Indicators of electoral victory , 2010 .

[3]  Stefan Krasa,et al.  The binary policy model , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[4]  K. Kenski,et al.  From Agenda Setting to Refusal Setting Survey Nonresponse as a Function of Media Coverage Across the 2004 Election Cycle , 2007 .

[5]  Slava J. Mikhaylov,et al.  Mapping policy preferences II: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003 , 2007 .

[6]  Pablo Amorós,et al.  Dialogue or issue divergence in the political campaign , 2007 .

[7]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election , 2007 .

[8]  Andrew H. Sidman,et al.  Mission Accomplished: The Wartime Election of 2004 , 2007 .

[9]  Herbert F. Weisberg,et al.  The US presidential and congressional elections, November 2004 , 2005 .

[10]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’ ☆ , 2005 .

[11]  J. Colomer,et al.  cleavages, issues and parties: a critical overview of the literature , 2005 .

[12]  Sven E. Feldmann.  Political Competition: Theory and Applications , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  James E. Campbell.  Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout , 2005 .

[14]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  The 2004 Presidential Election: The Emergence of a Permanent Majority? , 2005 .

[15]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000 , 2003 .

[16]  Barry C. Burden,et al.  Budget Rhetoric in Presidential Campaigns from 1952 to 2000 , 2003 .

[17]  I. Budge,et al.  Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 , 2001 .

[18]  John R. Petrocik.  Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .

[19]  M. McCombs,et al.  CAPACITY, DIVERSITY, AND VOLATILITY OF THE PUBLIC AGENDA TRENDS FROM 1954 TO 1994 , 1995 .

[20]  D. Wittman.  Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Donald E. Stokes,et al.  Spatial Models of Party Competition , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[22]  David E. RePass.  Issue Salience and Party Choice , 1929, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Jon S. Cohen,et al.  Voters and Values in the 2004 Election , 2005 .