A concurrent design of input shaping technique and a robust control for high-speed/high-precision control of a chip mounter

Abstract Input Shaping Technique (IST) and Time Delay Control (TDC), a robust feedback control law, were combined to achieve fast and precise point-to-point motion of a chip mounter. TDC was used as a feedback control to overcome disturbances and parameter variations, an IST was used to suppress the residual vibration induced in the closed loop system. TDC was designed first for the machine, and a discrete version of IST was designed on the basis of the closed-loop dynamics. In the design of TDC, a better set of gains was available thanks to the use of IST than TDC alone; in the design of IST, too, a better design was possible than IST alone. As the result of the concurrent design and synergy of the two methods, point-to-point motion could be achieved with no overshoot, the settling time of about 0.05 s and few steady-state errors to position commands of 1.5 mm. This result is far better than a conventional PID control or TDC alone could achieve, thereby showing the effectiveness of the concurrent design.

[1]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  A Time Delay Controller for Systems with Unknown Dynamics , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[2]  B. de Jager,et al.  Adaptive backstepping control for an XY-table , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[3]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  A model reference observer for time-delay control and its application to robot trajectory control , 1994, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Input Shaping With Negative Sequences for Reducing Vibrations in Flexible Structures , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[5]  Bert W. Rappole Minimizing Residual Vibrations in Flexible Systems , 1992 .

[6]  Tien C. Hsia,et al.  Robot manipulator control using decentralized linear time-invariant time-delayed joint controllers , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Design and Implementation of Digital Servo Controller for High Speed Machine Tools , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[8]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  High-precision control of positioning systems with nonsmooth nonlinearities , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration , 1990 .

[10]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  An observer design for time-delay control and its application to DC servo motor , 1994 .

[11]  Ratnesh Kumar,et al.  Assembly time optimization for PCB assembly , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[12]  K. Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Stability of Uncertain Linear Systems with Time Delay , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[13]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE POSITION CONTROL OF AN ELECTROHYDRAULIC SERVO SYSTEM USING TIME DELAY CONTROL , 1994 .

[14]  Pyung-Hun Chang,et al.  Robust force/position control of a robot manipulator using time-delay control , 1995 .

[15]  Neil C. Singer,et al.  Residual Vibration Reduction in Computer controlled Machines , 1989 .

[16]  Wook Hyun Kwon,et al.  A dynamic programming approach to a reel assignment problem of a surface mounting machine in printed circuit board assembly , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).