Sensitivity analysis for bias due to a misclassfied confounding variable in marginal structural models

In observational research treatment effects, the average treatment effect (ATE) estimator may be biased if a confounding variable is misclassified. We discuss the impact of classification error in a dichotomous confounding variable in analyses using marginal structural models estimated using inverse probability weighting (MSMs-IPW) and compare this with its impact in conditional regression models, focusing on a point-treatment study with a continuous outcome. Expressions were derived for the bias in the ATE estimator from a MSM-IPW and conditional model by using the potential outcome framework. Based on these expressions, we propose a sensitivity analysis to investigate and quantify the bias due to classification error in a confounding variable in MSMs-IPW. Compared to bias in the ATE estimator from a conditional model, the bias in MSM-IPW can be dissimilar in magnitude but the bias will always be equal in sign. A simulation study was conducted to study the finite sample performance of MSMs-IPW and conditional models if a confounding variable is misclassified. Simulation results showed that confidence intervals of the treatment effect obtained from MSM-IPW are generally wider and coverage of the true treatment effect is higher compared to a conditional model, ranging from over coverage if there is no classification error to smaller under coverage when there is classification error. The use of the bias expressions to inform a sensitivity analysis was demonstrated in a study of blood pressure lowering therapy. It is important to consider the potential impact of classification error in a confounding variable in studies of treatment effects and a sensitivity analysis provides an opportunity to quantify the impact of such errors on causal conclusions. An online tool for sensitivity analyses was developed: this https URL.

[1]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  Reflection on modern methods: five myths about measurement error in epidemiological research , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Michel Lang,et al.  rsimsum: Summarise results from Monte Carlo simulation studies , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[3]  Michael J Crowther,et al.  Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Peter M. Steiner,et al.  The Mechanics of Omitted Variable Bias: Bias Amplification and Cancellation of Offsetting Biases , 2016, Journal of causal inference.

[5]  E. Moodie,et al.  Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models. , 2016, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Simulation-Extrapolation for Estimating Means and Causal Effects with Mismeasured Covariates , 2015 .

[7]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions , 2015, Epidemiology.

[8]  Richard F MacLehose,et al.  Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  I. White,et al.  A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  J. R. Lockwood,et al.  Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates. , 2013, Biometrika.

[11]  Ronald B. Geskus,et al.  ipw: An R Package for Inverse Probability Weighting , 2011 .

[12]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal Inference , 2011, Twenty-one Mental Models That Can Change Policing.

[13]  William R. Shadish,et al.  On the Importance of Reliable Covariate Measurement in Selection Bias Adjustments Using Propensity Scores , 2011 .

[14]  Onyebuchi A Arah,et al.  Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding for General Outcomes, Treatments, and Confounders , 2011, Epidemiology.

[15]  Judea Pearl,et al.  On Measurement Bias in Causal Inference , 2010, UAI.

[16]  Els Goetghebeur,et al.  Comparison of causal effect estimators under exposure misclassification , 2010 .

[17]  John P. Buonaccorsi,et al.  Measurement Error: Models, Methods, and Applications , 2010 .

[18]  A. Hoes,et al.  Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Timothy L. Lash,et al.  Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data , 2009, Statistics for Biology and Health.

[20]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Causal Inference , 2010 .

[21]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  D. Rubin.  For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis , 2008, 0811.1640.

[23]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[24]  Patrick Royston,et al.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  J. Nelson,et al.  Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[26]  M. Feinleib.  National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) , 2005 .

[27]  P. Levy.  Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and Epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments , 2004 .

[28]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Analysis of Complex Survey Samples , 2004 .

[29]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimating the causal effect of zidovudine on CD4 count with a marginal structural model for repeated measures , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  K. Michels,et al.  A renaissance for measurement error. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[32]  S Greenland,et al.  Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[33]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Formal modes of statistical inference for causal effects , 1990 .

[34]  D. V. Lindley,et al.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment , 1980 .

[35]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[36]  Robert W Platt,et al.  The Effect of Error-in-Confounders on the Estimation of the Causal Parameter When Using Marginal Structural Models and Inverse Probability-of-Treatment Weights: A Simulation Study , 2014, The international journal of biostatistics.

[37]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[38]  Alexander Kukush,et al.  Measurement Error Models , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[39]  S. Cole,et al.  Using marginal structural measurement-error models to estimate the long-term effect of antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[40]  James M. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models versus Structural nested Models as Tools for Causal inference , 2000 .

[41]  J. Montaner,et al.  Quantification of the variation due to laboratory and physiologic sources in CD4 lymphocyte counts of clinically stable HIV-infected individuals. , 1995, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association.