Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery disease: does automated image registration improve image quality?

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive imaging alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for patients with carotid artery disease. In DSA, image quality can be improved by shifting the mask image if the patient has moved during angiography. This study investigated whether such image registration may also help to improve the image quality of carotid MRA. Data from 370 carotid MRA examinations of patients likely to have carotid artery disease were prospectively collected. The standard nonregistered MRAs were compared to automatically linear, affine and warp registered MRA by using three image quality parameters: the vessel detection probability (VDP) in maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in MIP images, and contrast-to-noise ratio in three-dimensional image volumes. A body shift of less than 1 mm occurred in 96.2% of cases. Analysis of variance revealed no significant influence of image registration and body shift on image quality (p > 0.05). In conclusion, standard contrast-enhanced carotid MRA usually requires no image registration to improve image quality and is generally robust against any naturally occurring body shift.

[1]  D. Purdie.  Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn , 2003 .

[2]  M. Reiser,et al.  Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography , 2007, European Radiology.

[3]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[4]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Nonrigid registration for subtraction CT angiography applied to the carotids and cranial arteries. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[5]  V. Chair,et al.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the , 2006, Circulation.

[6]  J. Gillard,et al.  Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Guidelines for Screening of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; Cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology , 2007, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[9]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[10]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  I. Kronzon,et al.  Primary prevention of ischemic stroke. , 2001, Circulation.

[12]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Underinvestigation and undertreatment of carotid disease in elderly patients with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: comparative population based study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Comparing several groups using analysis of variance , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  Jan Menke,et al.  Improving the image quality of contrast-enhanced MR angiography by automated image registration: a prospective study in peripheral arterial disease of the lower extremities. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[15]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Plaque and Stent Artifact Reduction in Subtraction CT Angiography Using Nonrigid Registration and a Volume Penalty , 2005, MICCAI.

[16]  Jan Menke,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in peripheral arterial disease: Improving image quality by automated image registration , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Evaluation of an improved technique for lumen path definition and lumen segmentation of atherosclerotic vessels in CT angiography , 2006, European Radiology.

[18]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  J W Sayre,et al.  Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[20]  H. Diener,et al.  Risk Factors, Outcome, and Treatment in Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke: The German Stroke Data Bank , 2001, Stroke.

[21]  S. Goldstein.  Cardiac Remodeling: Mechanism and Treatment , 2006 .

[22]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  EFNS guideline on neuroimaging in acute stroke. Report of an EFNS task force , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[23]  E. Klotz,et al.  Cervical CT Angiography Comparing Routine Noncontrast and a Late Venous Scan as Masks for Automated Bone Subtraction: Feasibility Study and Examination of the Influence of Patient Motion on Image Quality , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[24]  D. Birchall,et al.  Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  Irene Katzan,et al.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the , 2006, Stroke.

[26]  Need for background suppression in contrast‐enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.