Performance comparison between the high‐speed Yokogawa spinning disc confocal system and single‐point scanning confocal systems

Fluorescence microscopy of the dynamics of living cells presents a special challenge to a microscope imaging system, simultaneously requiring both high spatial resolution and high temporal resolution, but with illumination levels low enough to prevent fluorophore damage and cytotoxicity. We have compared the high‐speed Yokogawa CSU10 spinning disc confocal system with several conventional single‐point scanning confocal (SPSC) microscopes, using the relationship between image signal‐to‐noise ratio and fluorophore photobleaching as an index of system efficiency. These studies demonstrate that the efficiency of the CSU10 consistently exceeds that of the SPSC systems. The high efficiency of the CSU10 means that quality images can be collected with much lower levels of illumination; the CSU10 was capable of achieving the maximum signal‐to‐noise of an SPSC system at illumination levels that incur only at 1/15th of the rate of the photobleaching of the SPSC system. Although some of the relative efficiency of the CSU10 system may be attributed to the use of a CCD rather than a photomultiplier detector system, our analyses indicate that high‐speed imaging with the SPSC system is limited by fluorescence saturation at the high levels of illumination frequently needed to collect images at high frame rates. The high speed, high efficiency and freedom from fluorescence saturation combine to make the CSU10 effective for extended imaging of living cells at rates capable of capturing the three‐dimensional motion of endosomes moving up to several micrometres per second.

[1]  G. M. P. VAN KEMPEN,et al.  A quantitative comparison of image restoration methods for confocal microscopy , 1997 .

[2]  Y. Hirota,et al.  Formation of planar and spiral Ca2+ waves in isolated cardiac myocytes. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[3]  David R. Sandison,et al.  Quantitative Fluorescence Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) , 1995 .

[4]  A. Nakano Spinning-disk confocal microscopy -- a cutting-edge tool for imaging of membrane traffic. , 2002, Cell structure and function.

[5]  Murray Evaluating the performance of fluorescence microscopes , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  E. Salmon,et al.  Spinning disk confocal microscope system for rapid high-resolution, multimode, fluorescence speckle microscopy and green fluorescent protein imaging in living cells. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  Jan Schmoranzer,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of post-Golgi carrier exocytosis in epithelial cells , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  T. Oite,et al.  Real-time observation of hemodynamic changes in glomerular aneurysms induced by anti-Thy-1 antibody. , 2001, Kidney international.

[9]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  Determining the position of the cell division plane , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Torsten Wittmann,et al.  A high-speed multispectral spinning-disk confocal microscope system for fluorescent speckle microscopy of living cells. , 2003, Methods.

[11]  Fred Chang,et al.  Actin dynamics in the contractile ring during cytokinesis in fission yeast , 2002, Nature.

[12]  P. Verveer,et al.  A comparison of image restoration approaches applied to three‐dimensional confocal and wide‐field fluorescence microscopy , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: A comparison of laser-scanning confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Jason R Swedlow,et al.  Live cell imaging using wide-field microscopy and deconvolution. , 2002, Cell structure and function.

[15]  Direct View Confocal Imaging Systems Using a Slit Aperture , 1995 .

[16]  J. Pennington,et al.  Brefeldin A rapidly disrupts plasma membrane polarity by blocking polar sorting in common endosomes of MDCK cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[17]  Y. Barral,et al.  Spindle orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the transport of microtubule ends along polarized actin cables , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Shinya Inoué,et al.  Direct-view high-speed confocal scanner: the CSU-10. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[19]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Signal-to-Noise in Confocal Microscopes , 1995 .

[20]  Jeffrey L Clendenon,et al.  Voxx: a PC-based, near real-time volume rendering system for biological microscopy. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[21]  Takeo Tanaami,et al.  High-speed 1-frame/ms scanning confocal microscope with a microlens and Nipkow disks. , 2002, Applied optics.

[22]  Ian Parker,et al.  Video-rate confocal microscopy. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  S W Hell,et al.  Comparison of the axial resolution of practical Nipkow‐disk confocal fluorescence microscopy with that of multifocal multiphoton microscopy: theory and experiment , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[24]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.