Urban Accessibility and Social Equity in Covid-19 Era: A Spatial Analysis in Two Neighbourhoods of the City of Naples

The academic debate has been turn the attention on pedestrian accessibility to urban services, as walking allow to solve several issues ranging from social and health problems also accentuated by the ongoing pandemic. The innovation in geospatial field has encouraged the development of accessibility and walkability measures and indicators oriented to measure the main physical and functional characteristics of the built environment related to the accessibility of urban services at the neighbourhood scale. According to these premises, this research work, aimed at improving pedestrian accessibility and guaranteeing equal access to neighbourhood-scale services, proposes a seven-steps GIS method based on an Accessibility Indicator that integrates the main aspects of walkability indexes relating to connectivity, sense of security, geometry and amenity of urban built environment. This Accessibility Indicator defines the areas of easy accessibility to the local essential services, by referring to two different maximum distances: the first relates to the distance of 700 m defined in the literature as the distance that a user is willing to walk to use a neighborhood service and the second relates to the regulatory restrictions adopted in the most difficult periods of the pandemic (500 m). © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

[1]  M. Southworth.  Designing the Walkable City , 2005 .

[2]  Claudia Yamu,et al.  A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy , 2020, European Planning Studies.

[3]  H. -. Kim,et al.  Built Environment Factors Influencing Walking to School Behaviors: A Comparison between a Small and Large US City , 2016, Front. Public Health.

[4]  M. Pratt,et al.  The economic burden of physical inactivity: a systematic review and critical appraisal , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  D. Buchwald,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on residential location in the US. , 2012, Health & place.

[6]  Alexandra Brewis,et al.  City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: an integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[7]  C. Gargiulo,et al.  Defining the characteristics of walking paths to promote an active ageing , 2020 .

[8]  J. Sallis,et al.  Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality , 2006 .

[9]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[10]  A. Sforza,et al.  An Optimization Model Fitting the Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools , 2018, Sustainability.

[11]  Francesco Pinna,et al.  Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities , 2017 .

[12]  I. Pigeot,et al.  Development and application of a moveability index to quantify possibilities for physical activity in the built environment of children. , 2011, Health & place.

[13]  Carmela Gargiulo,et al.  Urban services, pedestrian networks and behaviors to measure elderly accessibility , 2021, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[14]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Comparing walkability methods: Creation of street smart walk score and efficacy of a code-based 3D walkability index , 2021 .

[15]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[16]  S. Titze,et al.  Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[17]  I. Pigeot,et al.  Objective Measures of the Built Environment and Physical Activity in Children: From Walkability to Moveability , 2015, Journal of Urban Health.

[18]  Use of Walk Opportunities Index to Quantify Local Accessibility , 2006 .

[19]  Sybil Derrible,et al.  Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI) , 2014 .

[20]  Sungyop Kim,et al.  Assessing mobility in an aging society: Personal and built environment factors associated with older people's subjective transportation deficiency in the US , 2011 .

[21]  S. Rossetti,et al.  In field assessment of existing pedestrian paths: A comprehensive approach towards pedestrian oriented neighbourhoods , 2020 .

[22]  J. Sallis,et al.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  Claudia Yamu,et al.  Delft University of Technology An Integrated Modeling Approach Combining Multifractal Urban Planning with a Space Syntax Perspective , 2017 .

[24]  Ivan Blecic,et al.  Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban Analysts , 2020, Sustainability.

[25]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  The walkability planning support system: An evidence-based tool to design healthy communities , 2017 .

[26]  Floriana Zucaro,et al.  Smart mobility: An evaluation method to audit Italian cities , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[27]  Martin A. Andresen,et al.  Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[29]  Bahareh Motamed,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE WALKING ENVIRONMENT IN A MEGACITY: CASE STUDY OF VALIASR STREET, TEHRAN , 2016 .

[30]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity: Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.