Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Coupled to a Robotic Hand Orthosis Aimed for Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients

Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) have shown potential for the rehabilitation of stroke patients; however, low performance has restricted their application in clinical environments. Therefore, this work presents the implementation of a BCI system, coupled to a robotic hand orthosis and driven by hand motor imagery of healthy subjects and the paralysed hand of stroke patients. A novel processing stage was designed using a bank of temporal filters, the common spatial pattern algorithm for feature extraction and particle swarm optimisation for feature selection. Offline tests were performed for testing the proposed processing stage, and results were compared with those computed with common spatial patterns. Afterwards, online tests with healthy subjects were performed in which the orthosis was activated by the system. Stroke patients' average performance was 74.1 ± 11%. For 4 out of 6 patients, the proposed method showed a statistically significant higher performance than the common spatial pattern method. Healthy subjects' average offline and online performances were of 76.2 ± 7.6% and 70 ± 6.7, respectively. For 3 out of 8 healthy subjects, the proposed method showed a statistically significant higher performance than the common spatial pattern method. System's performance showed that it has a potential to be used for hand rehabilitation of stroke patients.

[1]  G. R. Muller,et al.  Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  On the existence of different alpha band rhythms in the hand area of man , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  M. Molinari,et al.  Proof of principle of a brain-computer interface approach to support poststroke arm rehabilitation in hospitalized patients: design, acceptability, and usability. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[6]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[8]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  O Bertrand,et al.  A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Geurts,et al.  Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: who regains hand capacity? , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Null Space and Orthogonal Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  I. Miyai,et al.  Near-infrared Spectroscopy–mediated Neurofeedback Enhances Efficacy of Motor Imagery–based Training in Poststroke Victims: A Pilot Study , 2013, Stroke.

[13]  C. Braun,et al.  Combination of Brain-Computer Interface Training and Goal-Directed Physical Therapy in Chronic Stroke: A Case Report , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Qingguo Wei,et al.  Binary particle swarm optimization for frequency band selection in motor imagery based brain-computer interfaces. , 2015, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[15]  A. Pavlovic,et al.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[18]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Josefina Gutiérrez-Martínez,et al.  Increasing Stroke patients motor imagery Classification by Selecting Features with Particle Swarm optimisation , 2017, GBCIC.

[20]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Presence of Finger Extension and Shoulder Abduction Within 72 Hours After Stroke Predicts Functional Recovery: Early Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke: The EPOS Cohort Study , 2010, Stroke.

[21]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[22]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  PSO-based dimension reduction of EEG recordings: Implications for subject transfer in BCI , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[23]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Using particle swarm to select frequency band and time interval for feature extraction of EEG based BCI , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[24]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[25]  Mario Cortese,et al.  Enhancing brain-machine interface (BMI) control of a hand exoskeleton using electrooculography (EOG) , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Better than random? A closer look on BCI results , 2008 .

[27]  Chao Li,et al.  A Brain-Machine Interface Based on ERD/ERS for an Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Control , 2016, Sensors.

[28]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[29]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[30]  D. E. Viñas,et al.  Caracterización de la actividad eléctrica cerebral relacionada con la imaginación del movimiento de la mano en sujetos sanos , 2014 .

[31]  Ian Swain,et al.  Assistive technologies: can they contribute to rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke? , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  Hao Zhang,et al.  An Iterative Method for Classifying Stroke Subjects’ Motor Imagery EEG Data in the BCI-FES Rehabilitation Training System , 2014 .

[33]  Sarah N. Kraeutner,et al.  Motor imagery-based brain activity parallels that of motor execution: Evidence from magnetic source imaging of cortical oscillations , 2014, Brain Research.

[34]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Brain–Computer Interface Driven Hand Orthosis , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke , 2015, Neurobiology of Disease.

[36]  Jessica Cantillo-Negrete,et al.  Mechanical structure prototype and control unit for an active orthosis for a human had , 2014, 2014 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE).

[37]  J. Cantillo-Negrete,et al.  [Characterization of electrical brain activity related to hand motor imagery in healthy subjects]. , 2014, Revista de investigacion clinica; organo del Hospital de Enfermedades de la Nutricion.

[38]  J. Cantillo-Negrete,et al.  Control signal for a mechatronic hand orthosis aimed for neurorehabilitation , 2015, 2015 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE).

[39]  Wei-Yen Hsu,et al.  Independent Component Analysis and Multiresolution Asymmetry Ratio for Brain–Computer Interface , 2013, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.