DICOM Standard Conformance in Veterinary Medicine in Germany: a Survey of Imaging Studies in Referral Cases

In 2016, the recommendations of the DICOM Standards Committee for the use of veterinary identification DICOM tags had its 10th anniversary. The goal of our study was to survey veterinary DICOM standard conformance in Germany regarding the specific identification tags veterinarians should use in veterinary diagnostic imaging. We hypothesized that most veterinarians in Germany do not follow the guidelines of the DICOM Standards Committee. We analyzed the metadata of 488 imaging studies of referral cases from 115 different veterinary institutions in Germany by computer-aided DICOM header readout. We found that 25 (5.1%) of the imaging studies fully complied with the “veterinary DICOM standard” in this survey. The results confirmed our hypothesis that the recommendations of the DICOM Standards Committee for the consistent and advantageous use of veterinary identification tags have found minimal acceptance amongst German veterinarians. DICOM does not only enable connectivity between machines, DICOM also improves communication between veterinarians by sharing correct and valuable metadata for better patient care. Therefore, we recommend that lecturers, universities, societies, authorities, vendors, and other stakeholders should increase their effort to improve the spread of the veterinary DICOM standard in the veterinary world.

[1]  William J Hornof,et al.  Digital radiography artifacts. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[2]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Incorporating Out-Patient Data From CD-R Into the Local PACS Using DICOM Worklist Features , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  S. Puchalski IMAGE DISPLAY: Image Display , 2008 .

[4]  B. Poteet Veterinary teleradiology. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[5]  Travis Saveraid,et al.  Hospital, radiology, and picture archiving and communication systems. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[6]  D. Ballance The network and its role in digital imaging and communications in medicine imaging. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[7]  W. D. Bidgood,et al.  Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  Peter M. Kuzmak,et al.  Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors , 2001, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Alex Gough Breed predispositions to disease in dogs and cats [2nd ed.] , 2004 .

[10]  D. Ballance,et al.  Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[11]  William R Widmer,et al.  Acquisition hardware for digital imaging. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[12]  Bruce Reiner,et al.  Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  B. Poteet VETERINARY TELERADIOLOGY: Veterinary Teleradiology , 2008 .

[14]  M. Elon Gale,et al.  DICOM Modality Worklist: An essential component in a PACS environment , 2000, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Mats Stenström,et al.  DICOM Metadata repository for technical information in digital medical images , 2009, Acta oncologica.

[16]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Automated detection of changes in patient exposure in digital projection radiography using exposure index from DICOM header metadata , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[17]  D. Mellor,et al.  Assessment of low-cost teleradiology for grading elbow dysplasia. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[18]  Régis Beuscart,et al.  DicomWorks: Software for Reviewing DICOM Studies and Promoting Low-cost Teleradiology , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[20]  S. Wallack Digital image storage. , 2008, Health devices.

[21]  A Jahnen,et al.  Automatic computed tomography patient dose calculation using DICOM header metadata. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[22]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Evaluation of the Use of CD-ROM Upload into the PACS or Institutional Web Server , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[23]  Fintan J. McEvoy,et al.  Security of Patient and Study Data Associated with DICOM Images when Transferred Using Compact Disc Media , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[24]  S. Puchalski Image display. , 2008, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.