Pattern mining uncovers social prompts of conceptual learning with physical and virtual representations

To succeed in STEM, students need to connect visual representations to domain-relevant concepts, which is a difficult task for them. Prior research shows that physical representations (that students manipulate with their hands) and virtual representations (that they manipulate on a computer) have complementary advantages for conceptual learning. Further, physical and virtual representations are often embedded into different social classroom practices. Thus, to optimally combine these representation modes, we need to understand what social events prompt students to connect representations to concepts, and if different representation modes afford different social prompts. A multiple-case study with 12 high-school students addresses this question. Student pairs worked with physical and virtual representations of chemistry. Frequent patterns obtained from discourse data show that students incrementally co-construct concept-representation connections, and that instructor prompts are key triggers of these connections for both representation modes. Meta-cognitive statements serve as important prompts in the absence of an instructor when students work with virtual representations. I discuss implications for interventions that combine physical and virtual representations.

[1]  Robert Donmoyer Generalizability and the Single-Case Study , 2009 .

[2]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[3]  José María Luna Pattern mining: current status and emerging topics , 2016, Progress in Artificial Intelligence.

[4]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education , 2005 .

[5]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visualization : theory and practice in science education , 2008 .

[6]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[7]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation , 2012 .

[8]  J. Gilbert Chemical education: towards research-based practice , 2003 .

[9]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Comprehending and Learning from ‘Visualizations’: A Developmental Perspective , 2008 .

[10]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[11]  J. Roschelle Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[12]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  RM-Tool: A framework for discovering and evaluating association rules , 2011, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Enhancing undergraduate chemistry learning by helping students make connections among multiple graphical representations , 2015 .

[14]  T. Mueller Learning to Think Spatially , 2006 .

[15]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate , 1990 .

[16]  Marios Papaevripidou,et al.  Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students , 2012 .

[17]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[18]  A. Dreher,et al.  Teachers Facing the Dilemma of Multiple Representations Being Aid and Obstacle for Learning: Evaluations of Tasks and Theme-Specific Noticing , 2015 .

[19]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Models and Modelling in Chemical Education , 2002 .