Higher Order Autoshaping*

A series of experiments is reported on appetitive higher order conditioning in the pigeon. Experiment I showed that second order autoshaping can be produced by pairing a neutral keylight with a keylight of another colour, previously paired with food. Experiment II employed an omission procedure to show that second order autoshaping is a consequence of the contingency between first and second order stimuli. In Experiment III, extinction of responding to the first order stimulus was shown to reduce responding to the second order stimulus. Experiments IV and V showed firstly that this reduction is not due to generalization of extinction, and secondly that second order key pecks may be produced in the absence of any pecking to the first order stimulus. The results suggest that second order autoshaping is based largely on a direct association between the first and second order stimuli.

[1]  P. L. Brown,et al.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  B. Campbell,et al.  The role of experience in the spontaneous activity of hungry rats. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Effects of reinforcement-paired stimuli on general activity , 1975 .

[5]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  R. W. Griffin,et al.  Second-order conditioning of the pigeon’s keypeck , 1977 .

[7]  Robert A. Rescorla,et al.  Second-order conditioning: Implications for theories of learning. , 1973 .

[8]  R. Rescorla,et al.  The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  R. Lubow,et al.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  D. R. Williams,et al.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .