Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters

Background Assesment of the coronary arteries after stent placement using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) currently requires reconstruction of images with soft kernels for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaques and dedicated edge enhancing kernels for the evaluation of the stent lumen. Purpose To evaluate a two-dimensional filter tool that provides instant postprocessing of images reconstructed with soft kernels into edge-enhanced images and vice versa and thus may eliminate the need for two separate reconstrcutions for the assessment of coronary artery stents using CCTA. Material and Methods Twenty stents with a diameter of 3.0 mm placed in a vascular phantom were scanned with a dual-source CT using standard parameters. Images were reconstructed with a soft B30f and an edge-enhancing B46f kernel and postprocessed with the corresponding filter algorithm (F30 for B30f images; F46 for B46f images). The resulting four data-sets were evaluated for lumen visibility, intraluminal attenuation, and image noise by two independent readers. Results were validated in vivo against invasive coronary angiography in data-sets from patients with coronary artery stents. Results Average intraluminal attenuation was 552.6 HU, 527.3 HU, 207.9 HU, and 267.5 HU for B30f, F30, B46f, and F46 images, respectively (P < 0.0001). Average image noise was 11.3, 10.6, 19.2, and 15.0 HU, respectively (P < 0.0001). The visible stent diameter was significantly higher in the B46f (59.6%) and F46 images (54%) compared to the B30f (48.3%) and F30 (51.5%) images (P < 0.0001). In the patient study, lumen assessability was significantly better in B46f images than in F46 images. Sensitivity for stenosis detection was best in the original B46f images with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 94%. Conclusion The postprocessing filter reduces image noise, however currently it does not offer an alternative to image reconstruction using the edge-enhancing kernels for the evaluation of the stent lumen.

[1]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[2]  J. Gudjónsdóttir,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[3]  D. Andreini,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  G. De Luca,et al.  Benefits of drug-eluting stents as compared to bare metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: four year results of the PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting stent vs bare metal stent in primary angiOplasty (PASEO) randomized trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[5]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[6]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations , 2008, European Radiology.

[7]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single-center experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[8]  J. Sayre,et al.  Evaluation of Coronary Stents and Stenoses at Different Heart Rates With Dual Source Spiral CT (DSCT) , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[9]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Influence of convolution filtering on coronary plaque attenuation values: observations in an ex vivo model of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  W. Heindel,et al.  64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Carol DeFrances,et al.  2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 2005, National health statistics reports.

[13]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter , 2005, European Radiology.

[14]  Graves Ej,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey , 2004 .

[15]  G. Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[17]  W. Heindel,et al.  Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[18]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. , 1999, Circulation.

[19]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT , 2008, European Radiology.

[20]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .