Performance evaluation of manufacturing systems based on dependability management indicators—case study: chemical industry

Dependability is a key decision factor in today’s global business environment affecting product cost and process. Dependability reflects user confidence in fitness for use by attaining satisfaction in product performance capability, delivery, service availability upon demand, and minimizing cost. The main objective of this study is to develop an integrated approach for evaluation of manufacturing systems based on dependability indicators for conducting a better dependability management system (DMS) through integration of the principal component analysis (PCA) and the data envelopment analysis (DEA). To achieve the objective of this study, an industrial sector—chemicals and chemical products in Iran—is selected as the case of this study in accordance with the International Standard for Industrial Classification of all economic activities (ISIC). Firstly, we define dependability indicators, for both inputs and outputs, based on IEC 60300. Due to the extra amount of indicators, we utilize a hierarchical structure to cluster the indicators for an easier analysis. Secondly, for reducing the number of some variables, we apply pair-wise comparison to assign weights and to unify the related sub-criteria to one main criterion. Finally, an integrated DEA–PCA approach is employed to assess the most and the least dependable units and to find critical indicators in macro and micro levels in order to make policy for implementation of DMS in manufacturing systems.

[1]  Peter Söderholm A system view of the No Fault Found (NFF) phenomenon , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[3]  I. M. Premachandra A note on DEA vs principal component analysis: An improvement to Joe Zhu's approach , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[5]  Ramalingam Shanmugam,et al.  At a crossroad of data envelopment and principal component analyses , 2007 .

[6]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Measuring airport quality from the airlines' viewpoint: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Svetislav B. Kostic,et al.  Dependability, a key factor to the quality of products , 1995 .

[9]  Horia F. Pop,et al.  Principal component analysis versus fuzzy principal component analysis A case study: the quality of danube water (1985-1996). , 2005, Talanta.

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  M. Talbot,et al.  C-17 portable advanced diagnostic system , 1998, 1998 IEEE AUTOTESTCON Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Test Technology for the 21st Century (Cat. No.98CH36179).

[12]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Chapter 5 Duality, classification and slacks in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated PCA DEA framework for assessment and ranking of manufacturing systems based on equipment performance , 2007 .

[14]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[17]  V. Ebrahimipour,et al.  A synergetic approach for assessing and improving equipment performance in offshore industry based on dependability , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Michael Pecht,et al.  An investigation of ‘cannot duplicate’ failures , 1998 .

[20]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[21]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for continuous assessment and improvement of manufacturing systems , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[23]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[24]  Jukka Korpela,et al.  Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies , 2007 .