The magnitude of cutting forces at high speed.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Previous research has used a range of cutting forces for preparing teeth, but there are no data available on the forces actually imposed while cutting teeth with high-speed handpieces. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to measure the forces imposed while cutting teeth with tungsten carbide burs used in high-speed handpieces. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-one dentists each cut 8 conventional class II MO and DO preparations in intact extracted third molars, by use of 2 different air turbine handpieces with different torque-speed characteristics. Two different flat fissure, plain and cross-cut tungsten carbide burs, cutting wet and dry in each handpiece/bur combination. The teeth were mounted in a custom-made transducer unit that displayed the forces imposed by the bur. Data were analysed with a 1-way ANOVA (alpha =.05) and Spearman correlation test. RESULTS The results showed that there was no significant difference in the applied force between plain and cross-cut burs, cutting wet or cutting dry, but there was a significant difference between the high and the lower torque handpieces. The higher torque handpiece was used at a mean cutting force of 1.44 N and the lower torque handpiece at 1.20 N (P<.002). The overall general mean force observed was 1.30 N. CONCLUSION It was concluded that the forces used in cutting teeth with the tungsten carbide burs tested related both to the type of the handpiece and to the forces chosen by clinical operators. There was no difference between the plain and cross-cut burs, there was no difference between the cutting wet or dry, and the higher torque handpiece required a higher mean cutting force.

[1]  A S Atkinson The significance of blade geometry in the cutting efficiency of tungsten carbide dental burs at ultrahigh speeds , 1983, British Dental Journal.

[2]  Ann Arbor,et al.  A Study of the Cutting Efficiency of Dental Burs for the Straight Handpiece , 1951, Journal of dental research.

[3]  I A Westland The energy requirement of the dental cutting process. , 1980, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  E H Davies,et al.  The cleaning of dental diamond burs , 1983, British Dental Journal.

[5]  C. D. Givens,et al.  Lubricating coolants for high-speed dental handpieces. , 1989, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Numerical and experimental evaluation of energy inputs, temperature gradients, and thermal stresses during restorative procedures. , 1978, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  H Shintani,et al.  Studies on dental high-speed cutting with carbide burs used on bovine dentin. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  C. E. Watkins,et al.  Thermal and histologic response to high-speed and ultrahigh-speed cutting in tooth structure. , 1965, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  M. Pines,et al.  An experimental diamond stone: a preliminary report. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Effect of Cooling Techniques on Temperature Control and Cutting Rate for High-Speed Dental Drills , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[11]  Kenneth R. Cantwell,et al.  Thermogenics in cavity preparation using air turbine handpieces: The relationship of heat transferred to rate of tooth structure removal , 1964 .

[12]  Eames Wb,et al.  Cutting efficiency of diamond stones: effect of technique variables. , 1977 .

[13]  S C Siegel,et al.  Assessing the cutting efficiency of dental diamond burs. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  W. Eames,et al.  A comparison of cutting efficiency of air-driven fissure burs. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  A Matsui,et al.  Comparison of rotational speeds and torque properties between air-bearing and ball-bearing air-turbine handpieces. , 1989, Dental materials journal.

[16]  Martin F. Land,et al.  Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics , 1988 .

[17]  G A Morrant,et al.  Performance characteristics of air turbine handpieces , 1975, British Dental Journal.

[18]  M H Reisbick,et al.  Wear Characteristics of Burs , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[19]  K. Chan,et al.  The cutting effectiveness of carbide fissure burs on teeth. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  J. O. Semmelman,et al.  Cutting Studies at Air-Turbine Speeds , 1961 .

[21]  Evan H. Greener,et al.  Bur Geometry and Its Relationship to Cutting , 1968 .

[22]  Lammie Ga A comparison on the cutting efficiency and heat production of tungsten carbide and steel burs. , 1951 .

[24]  A Matsui,et al.  Dental cutting behaviour of mica-based and apatite-based machinable glass-ceramics. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[25]  R. Grajower,et al.  The grinding efficiency of diamond burs. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).