Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach

Risk assessment performs a critical decision support role in maintenance decision making. This is through assisting maintenance practitioners systematically identify, analyze, evaluate and mitigate equipment failures. Often, such failures are mitigated through formulating effective maintenance strategies. In asset maintenance, well-known risk assessment techniques include the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Bayesian Networks (BN). In recent years, considerable research attention has been directed towards improving existing techniques, often at the expense of a structured framework for selecting suitable risk assessment techniques. Often, several criteria influence the selection process. Moreover, the criteria are closely linked to specific organizational competencies that vary from one firm to another. In this study, a selection methodology for risk assessment techniques in the maintenance decision making domain is proposed. In the methodology, generic selection criteria for the FMEA, FTA and BN are derived based on the risk assessment process outlined in the ISO 31000:2009 standard. The criteria are prioritized using the Analytic Network Process (ANP), taking into account the judgment and opinion of academic and industrial domain experts. The results illustrate the usefulness of the proposed methodology towards assisting maintenance practitioners discern important competencies relevant to the specific technique and as such select the technique best suited for the organization.

[1]  Anne Johannes Jan Braaksma,et al.  A quantitative method for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis , 2012 .

[2]  Gilles Dusserre,et al.  Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants , 2002 .

[3]  Reliability-Centered Maintenance Don Barry Original by James Picknell 8Chapter Reliability by Design: Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 2016 .

[4]  R. Field Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[5]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  J. Moubray Reliability-Centered Maintenance , 1991 .

[7]  Drakoulis Martakos,et al.  Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities: critical overview and discussion , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Will Ozier,et al.  Risk Analysis and Assessment , 2000 .

[11]  Qian Fan,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts , 2013 .

[12]  H. Berg,et al.  RISK MANAGEMENT: PROCEDURES, METHODS AND EXPERIENCES , 2010 .

[13]  Ferdinando Chiacchio,et al.  Dynamic fault trees resolution: A conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[15]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian industries , 2010 .

[16]  P. K. Marhavilas,et al.  Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009 , 2011 .

[17]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning , 2003 .

[18]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[19]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Su Wu,et al.  A framework for intelligent reliability centered maintenance analysis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Toni Lupo,et al.  A fuzzy ServQual based method for reliable measurements of education quality in Italian higher education area , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Benoît Iung,et al.  Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Bayesian networks in reliability , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model , 2014 .

[25]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Borut Mavko,et al.  A dynamic fault tree , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment , 2008 .

[28]  Peter Muchiri,et al.  Maintenance optimization models and criteria , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[29]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Selection and application of risk management tools and techniques for build-operate-transfer projects , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[30]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  The use of Bayesian network modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Borut Mavko,et al.  Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  W. Klingenberg,et al.  Managing condition-based maintenance technology: A multiple case study in the process industry , 2011 .

[33]  Gilles Celeux,et al.  Designing a Bayesian network for preventive maintenance from expert opinions in a rapid and reliable way , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection , 2014 .

[37]  N. S. Arunraj,et al.  Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. , 2010 .

[38]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks , 2004 .

[39]  L. Pintelon,et al.  Asset Management. The Maintenance Perspective , 2013 .

[40]  W. Klingenberg,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis in asset maintenance: a multiple case study in the process industry , 2013 .

[41]  Sarojini Kesava Jajimoggala,et al.  Maintenance Strategy Evaluation Using ANP and Goal Programming , 2011, Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci..

[42]  Ying Luo,et al.  Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[43]  Srinivas Kumar Pinjala,et al.  An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies , 2006 .

[44]  Seyed Bagher Hosseini,et al.  Risk assessment model selection in construction industry , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[46]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  John Crocker,et al.  Age-related maintenance versus reliability centred maintenance: a case study on aero-engines , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[48]  Sharman Lichtenstein,et al.  Factors in the selection of a risk assessment method , 1996, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..