The reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre and composite impregnated glass fibre on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with wide mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities restored with either composite resin, or composite resin reinforced with different types of fibres. Materials and Methods: Fifty human maxillary premolars were selected. Five intact teeth served as positive controls. Endodontic therapy was carried out in the remaining forty-five teeth. Standardized MOD cavities were prepared in all the teeth. The teeth were restored with a nanocomposite using an incremental technique. These forty five teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups (Group A, B and C) (n = 15). The teeth in Group A did not undergo any further procedures. The teeth in Group B and C were reinforced with composite impregnated glass fibre and polyethylene fibre, respectively. Fracture resistance was measured in Newtons (N). Results: The positive controls showed the highest mean fracture resistance (811.90 N), followed by Group B (600.49N), Group A (516.96N) and Group C (514.64N), respectively. One Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed a statistically significant difference between all the groups (P = 0.001). Post-hoc Tukey test revealed a moderately significant difference (P = 0.034) between Control and Group B, and a strongly significant difference between Control and Group A (P = 0.002), and Control and Group C (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Endodontic therapy and MOD cavity preparation significantly reduced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars (P = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the experimental groups (Group A, B and C) (P > 0.1). However, the fracture resistance of the composite impregnated glass fibre reinforced group was much higher than the others.

[1]  Rupika Gogna,et al.  A comparative in vitro study of microleakage by a radioactive isotope and compressive strength of three nanofilled composite resin restorations , 2011, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[2]  M. Hegde,et al.  An evalution of compressive strength of newer nanocomposite: An in vitro study , 2011, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[3]  Sukesh Kumar,et al.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study , 2009, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[4]  J. Sadjadi,et al.  The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  M. Kala,et al.  Clinical evaluation of carbon fiber reinforced carbon endodontic post, glass fiber reinforced post with cast post and core: A one year comparative clinical study , 2008, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[6]  M. Hegde,et al.  An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents , 2008, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[7]  A. Erdemir,et al.  Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[8]  A. Erdemir,et al.  The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[9]  S. Mitra,et al.  An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  R. Peterson,et al.  Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  M Rosentritt,et al.  In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced-composite versus glass-fibre-reinforced-composite fixed partial dentures. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  Antonio Apicella,et al.  Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  J. Palamara,et al.  An investigation of cuspal deformation and delayed recovery after occlusal loading. , 2001, Journal of dentistry.

[14]  P. Vallittu Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  J. Summitt,et al.  Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach , 1996 .

[16]  L. C. Christensen,et al.  The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  H. Messer,et al.  Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. , 1989, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  L. Tronstad,et al.  Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. , 1986, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[19]  J. Nicholls,et al.  In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.