The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice

The power function is treated as the law relating response time to practice trials. However, the evidence for a power law is flawed, because it is based on averaged data. We report a survey that assessed the form of the practice function for individual learners and learning conditions in paradigms that have shaped theories of skill acquisition. We fit power and exponential functions to 40 sets of data representing 7,910 learning series from 475 subjects in 24 experiments. The exponential function fit better than the power function in all the unaveraged data sets. Averaging produced a bias in favor of the power function. A new practice function based on the exponential, the APEX function, fit better than a power function with an extra, preexperimental practice parameter. Clearly, the best candidate for the law of practice is the exponential or APEX function, not the generally accepted power function. The theoretical implications are discussed.

[1]  E. Thorndike.  Educational psychology, Vol 2: The psychology of learning. , 1913 .

[2]  M. Sidman.  A note on functional relations obtained from group data. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  W. Estes.  The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Estes Wk.  The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[5]  E. R. Crossman.  A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗ , 1959 .

[6]  R. Seibel.  DISCRIMINATION REACTION TIME FOR 1,023-ALTERNATIVE TASK. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[8]  A. Newell.  You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .

[9]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[10]  G. Mandler,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Age and storage dynamics in continuous recognition memory. , 1975 .

[12]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[14]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Learning as accumulation: a reexamination of the learning curve. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Learning as accumulation: a reexamination of the learning curve. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Gunst.  Regression analysis and its application , 1980 .

[17]  L. Jacoby.  Memory as cognition. , 1980, Science.

[18]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge Compilation: Mechanisms for the Automatization of Cognitive Skills. , 1980 .

[19]  D. G. MacKay.  The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[20]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[21]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[22]  Don M. Miller,et al.  Reducing Transformation Bias in Curve Fitting , 1984 .

[23]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[24]  Allen Newell,et al.  Learning by chunking: a production system model of practice , 1987 .

[25]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[26]  D. Ruppert,et al.  Transformation and Weighting in Regression , 1988 .

[27]  A. Newell,et al.  An integrated computational model of stimulus-response compatibility and practice , 1988 .

[28]  Adrian Bowman,et al.  On the use of nonparametric regression for model checking , 1989 .

[29]  A F Kramer,et al.  Development and transfer of automatic processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Kail,et al.  Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  R. Kass.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications , 1990 .

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[33]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[34]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[35]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms , 1992 .

[36]  L. Reder,et al.  What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer , 1992 .

[37]  G. Logan.  Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Representation and selection of relative position. , 1993 .

[39]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Representation and selection of relative position. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and skill acquisition: learning-performance distinctions. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[41]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. , 1994 .

[42]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Strategies and automaticity. I: Basic findings and conceptual framework , 1994 .

[43]  Matthew P. Wand,et al.  Kernel Smoothing , 1995 .

[44]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  The Weibull distribution, the power law, and the instance theory of automaticity. , 1995 .

[45]  Hans Colonius,et al.  The instance theory of automaticity: Why the Weibull? , 1995 .

[46]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  SOME TESTS OF AN IDENTICAL ELEMENTS MODEL OF BASIC ARITHMETIC SKILLS , 1996 .

[47]  Amy Wenzel,et al.  One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention , 1996 .

[48]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  Skill acquisition and repetition priming: One principle, many processes , 1996 .

[49]  W. Verwey.  BUFFER LOADING AND CHUNKING IN SEQUENTIAL KEYPRESSING , 1996 .

[50]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Some tests of an identical elements model of basic arithmetic skills. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  David H. Silvera,et al.  The learning curve as a metacognitive tool , 1996 .

[52]  Philip J. Stroffolino,et al.  To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection , 1997 .

[53]  T. Rickard.  Bending the power law : A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills , 1997 .

[54]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Richard B. Anderson,et al.  Artifactual power curves in forgetting , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[56]  T. Palmeri.  Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  J. Wixted,et al.  Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[58]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[59]  M Carrasco,et al.  “Transient structures”: The effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  L. Reder,et al.  The Strategy-Specific Nature of Improvement: The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task , 1998 .

[61]  T. Wickens.  On the form of the retention function : Comment on Rubin and Wenzel (1996) : A quantitative description of retention , 1998 .

[62]  J R Anderson,et al.  Practice and retention: a unifying analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  D. Rubin,et al.  The Precise Time Course of Retention , 1999 .

[64]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis , 2000, Memory & cognition.