Neural correlates of control operations in inverse priming with relevant and irrelevant masks

The inverse priming paradigm can be considered one example which demonstrates the operation of control processes in the absence of conscious experience of the inducing stimuli. Inverse priming is generated by a prime that is followed by a mask and a subsequent imperative target stimulus. With "relevant" masks that are composed of the superposition of both prime alternatives, the inverse priming effect is typically larger than with "irrelevant" masks that are free of task-relevant features. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural substrates that are involved in the generation of inverse priming effects with relevant and irrelevant masks. We found a network of brain areas that is accessible to unconscious primes, including supplementary motor area (SMA), anterior insula, middle cingulate cortex, and supramarginal gyrus. Activation of these brain areas were involved in inverse priming when relevant masks were used. With irrelevant masks, however, only SMA activation was involved in inverse priming effects. Activation in SMA correlated with inverse priming effects of individual participants on reaction time, indicating that this brain area reflects the size of inverse priming effects on the behavioral level. Findings are most consistent with the view that a basic inhibitory mechanism contributes to inverse priming with either type of mask and additional processes contribute to the effect with relevant masks. This study provides new evidence showing that cognitive control operations in the human cortex take account of task relevant stimulus information even if this information is not consciously perceived.

[1]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  U. Mattler,et al.  Inverse cue priming is not limited to masks with relevant features , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  M Eimer,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V. Stuphorn,et al.  Supplementary Motor Area Exerts Proactive and Reactive Control of Arm Movements , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Enns,et al.  Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  Simon van Gaal,et al.  Unconscious Activation of the Prefrontal No-Go Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Dissociable Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Conscious and Unconscious Control of Behavior , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Neural Activation During Response Competition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Uwe Mattler,et al.  Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  K. Amunts,et al.  Human V5/MT+: comparison of functional and cytoarchitectonic data , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[12]  松坂 義哉,et al.  Changing directions of forthcoming arm movements : neuronal activity in the presupplementary and supplementary motor area of monkey cerebral cortex , 1996 .

[13]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human extrastriate cortex in the region of V5/MT+: a probabilistic, stereotaxic map of area hOc5. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Peter Praamstra,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Response Competition: Motor Cortex Activation and Inhibition following Subliminal Response Priming , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. D'ostilio,et al.  Automatic Stimulus-Induced Medial Premotor Cortex Activation without Perception or Action , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[18]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: a reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[20]  Borís Burle,et al.  Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  G. Glover,et al.  Methods and Software for fMRI Analysis of Clinical Subjects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  Robert L. West,et al.  Positive and negative congruency effects in masked priming: A neuro-computational model based on representation, attention, and conflict , 2009, Brain Research.

[24]  R. Passingham,et al.  Unconscious Activation of the Cognitive Control System in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconsciously Triggered Inhibitory Control , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  Supplementary motor area activations in unconscious inhibition of voluntary action , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  R. Passingham,et al.  Attention to Intention , 2004, Science.

[29]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  Individual Differences in Subconscious Motor Control Predicted by GABA Concentration in SMA , 2010, Current Biology.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[33]  P. Jaśkowski,et al.  How important is a prime’s gestalt for subliminal priming? , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[34]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[35]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Uwe Mattler,et al.  Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  R N Shepard,et al.  Path-guided apparent motion. , 1983, Science.

[40]  U. Mattler,et al.  PRP-paradigm provides evidence for a perceptual origin of the negative compatibility effect , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[42]  M. Leboyer,et al.  Conscious and subliminal conflicts in normal subjects and patients with schizophrenia: The role of the anterior cingulate , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[44]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Functionally dissociating temporal and motor components of response preparation in left intraparietal sulcus , 2011, NeuroImage.

[46]  M. Husain,et al.  At the Edge of Consciousness : Automatic Motor Activation and Voluntary Control , 2008 .

[47]  R. Verleger,et al.  What determines the direction of subliminal priming , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[48]  Uwe Mattler,et al.  Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model , 2012, Cognition.

[49]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[51]  David E Huber,et al.  Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Huifang Wang,et al.  Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information , 1995 .

[54]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[55]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  W. Singer,et al.  The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[58]  M Eimer,et al.  A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: The Distinct Lateralization and Localization of Motor Attention in the Human Brain , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Pre-SMA Gray-matter Density Predicts Individual Differences in Action Selection in the Face of Conscious and Unconscious Response Conflict , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  U. Mattler Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. , 1989, Science.

[64]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[65]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[66]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[67]  U. Mattler On the locus of priming and inverse priming effects , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.