Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of different first-line chemotherapy durations in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS We searched literature databases to identify randomized controlled trials that compared different chemotherapy durations in the first-line treatment of MBC. Only trials with unconfounded comparisons of additional cycles of chemotherapy were included. The main outcome measures for this analysis were OS and PFS. Published data from retrieved studies were analyzed according to standard meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS We found 11 randomized clinical trials including 2,269 patients. Longer first-line chemotherapy duration resulted into a significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99; P = .046) and PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.76; P < .001). There were no differences in effects on either OS or PFS between subgroups defined by time of random assignment, study design, number of chemotherapy cycles in the control arm or concomitant endocrine therapy. CONCLUSION Longer first-line chemotherapy duration is associated with marginally longer OS and a substantially longer PFS.

[1]  J. Mayordomo,et al.  Final results of a randomized trial on the role of maintenance chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Ruíz,et al.  Maintenance treatment with Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus observation following induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM 2001-01 study , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  Seema A Khan,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions : Explanation and Elaboration , 2009 .

[5]  B. Kavanagh,et al.  Reply to X. Mirabel , 2009 .

[6]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[7]  Kristine Broglio,et al.  Trends in survival over the past two decades among white and black patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  K. Gelmon,et al.  The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population‐based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[9]  M. Sydes,et al.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis , 2007, Trials.

[10]  O. Nanni,et al.  Lack of benefit of maintenance paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. Orlandini,et al.  Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20‐year period , 2005, Cancer.

[12]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: trends in survival during a 14-year period. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  M. Stockler,et al.  Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer , 2004 .

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  M. Stockler,et al.  Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer – How Long Should it Continue? , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[16]  J. Klijn,et al.  Continuing chemotherapy or not after the induction treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. clinical outcomes and oncologists' preferences. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[17]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Palliative effect of chemotherapy: objective tumor response is associated with symptom improvement in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  G. Sledge,et al.  Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  T. Powles,et al.  A randomised trial of six versus twelve courses of chemotherapy in metastatic carcinoma of the breast. , 1997, European journal of cancer.

[20]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[21]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[22]  C. Spurr,et al.  Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Carmichael,et al.  Comparison of short-term and continuous chemotherapy (mitozantrone) for advanced breast cancer , 1990, The Lancet.

[24]  M. Tattersall,et al.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  K. Markou,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Head and Neck Cancers NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology . 2010. , 2011 .

[26]  H. Mouridsen,et al.  Decreased efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer when reducing treatment duration from 18 to 6 months. , 1993, European journal of cancer.