Gravitational acceleration as a cue for absolute size and distance?

When an object’s motion is influenced by gravity, as in the rise and fall of a thrown ball, the vertical component of acceleration is roughly constant at 9.8 m/sec2. In principle, an observer could use this information to estimate the absolute size and distance of the object (Saxberg, 1987a; Watson, Banks, von Hofsten, & Royden, 1992). In five experiments, we examined people’s ability to utilize the size and distance information provided by gravitational acceleration. Observers viewed computer simulations of an object rising and falling on a trajectory aligned with the gravitational vector. The simulated objects were balls of different diameters presented across a wide range of simulated distances. Observers were asked to identify the ball that was presented and to estimate its distance. The results showed that observers were much more sensitive to average velocity than to the gravitational acceleration pattern. Likewise, verticality of the motion and visibility of the trajectory’s apex had negligible effects on the accuracy of size and distance judgments.

[1]  D. Rosenbaum.  Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. , 1975 .

[2]  P. J. Brancazio.  Looking into Chapman’s homer: The physics of judging a fly ball , 1985 .

[3]  The Focal Encyclopedia Of Film Amp Television Techniques , 1969 .

[4]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[5]  P J Kellman,et al.  Extracting object motion during observer motion: combining constraints from optic flow and binocular disparity. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.

[7]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[8]  J L Dannemiller,et al.  Role of image acceleration in judging landing location of free-falling projectiles. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Tresilian.  A Note on “Gravity as a Monocular Cue for Perception of Absolute Distance and/or Absolute Size” , 1994, Perception.

[10]  K J Ciuffreda,et al.  Accommodation and Apparent Distance , 1988, Perception.

[11]  Martin S Banks,et al.  Gravity as a Monocular Cue for Perception of Absolute Distance and/or Absolute Size , 1992 .

[12]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[14]  B. Saxberg,et al.  Projected free fall trajectories. I. Theory and simulation. , 1987, Biological cybernetics.

[15]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets , 1990, Perception.

[16]  B. Gillam,et al.  The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape , 1991, Nature.

[18]  Irwin D. Kuntz,et al.  Theory and simulation , 1994 .

[19]  B. Saxberg,et al.  Projected free fall trajectories. II. Human experiments. , 1987, Biological cybernetics.