Numerical time integrationfor dynamic analysis using a newhigher order predictor-corrector method

Purpose – This paper aims to provide a simple and accurate higher order predictor‐corrector integration which can be used in dynamic analysis and to compare it with the previous works.Design/methodology/approach – The predictor‐corrector integration is defined by combining the higher order explicit and implicit integrations in which displacement and velocity are assumed to be functions of accelerations of several previous time steps. By studying the accuracy and stability conditions, the weighted factors and acceptable time step are determined.Findings – Simplicity and vector operations plus accuracy and stability are the main specifications of the new predictor‐corrector method. This procedure can be used in linear and nonlinear dynamic analysis.Research limitations/implications – In the proposed integration, time step is assumed to be constant.Practical implications – The numerical integration is the heart of a dynamic analysis. The result's accuracy is strongly influenced by the accuracy and stability ...

[1]  Jin Yeon Cho,et al.  From the trapezoidal rule to higher-order accurate and unconditionally stable time-integration method for structural dynamics , 1997 .

[2]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[3]  Tulay Aksu Ozkul.  A finite element formulation for dynamic analysis of shells of general shape by using the Wilson-θ method , 2004 .

[4]  Delfim Soares,et al.  A frequency-domain FEM approach based on implicit Green¿s functions for non-linear dynamic analysis , 2005 .

[5]  Mario Paz,et al.  Structural Dynamics: Theory and Computation , 1981 .

[6]  K. Bathe,et al.  On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics , 2005 .

[7]  W. L. Wood,et al.  A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 1: General formulation and applications , 1984 .

[8]  Kumar K. Tamma,et al.  A theory of development and design of generalized integration operators for computational structural dynamics , 2001 .

[9]  W. L. Wood,et al.  Comparison of some single‐step methods for the numerical solution of the structural dynamic equation , 1985 .

[10]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  Higher derivative explicit one step methods for non‐linear dynamic problems. Part I: Design and theory , 1990 .

[11]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis: a comparison between force-based and Displacement-Based Frame Element Models , 2005 .

[12]  G. Hulbert.  A unified set of single-step asymptotic annihilation algorithms for structural dynamics , 1994 .

[13]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  TWO SIMPLE FAST INTEGRATION METHODS FOR LARGE‐SCALE DYNAMIC PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING , 1996 .

[14]  S. Modak,et al.  The generalized method for structural dynamics applications , 2002 .

[15]  A numerical integration technique for conservative oscillators combining nonstandard finite-difference methods with a Hamilton's principle , 2005 .

[16]  W. L. Wood.  A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 2: Theory , 1984 .

[17]  P. Wriggers.  Nonlinear Finite Element Methods , 2008 .

[18]  J. M. Peña.  Characterizations and stable tests for the Routh–Hurwitz conditions and for total positivity , 2004 .

[19]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A unified set of single step algorithms part 3: The beta-m method, a generalization of the Newmark scheme , 1985 .

[20]  R. Taylor,et al.  Higher derivative explicit one step methods for non-linear dynamic problems. Part II: Practical calculations and comparisons with other higher order methods , 1990 .

[21]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[22]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  A new load-dependent Ritz vector method for structural dynamics analyses: quasi-static Ritz vectors , 2000 .

[23]  T. Fung.  Complex-time-step Newmark methods with controllable numerical dissipation , 1998 .

[24]  B T Rosson,et al.  Higher-Order Implicit Dynamic Time Integration Method , 2005 .