The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation

This paper examines three issues concerning the frequently documented negative correlation between formal education and ethnic prejudice, namely its reliability, its validity and the manner in which it is mediated. Reliability is demonstrated across three indices of ethnic attitudes in seven representative samples drawn from four European countries (West Germany, Netherlands, France, Great Britain; total N=3788). The hypothesis that this correlation reflects only the tendency of more highly educated respondents to give more socially desirable answers and not true attitude differences was inconsistent with the finding from the survey data that educational level also correlated negatively with responses to an index of subtle prejudice. Results from an experiment employing the bogus pipeline procedure similarly refute this hypothesis, indicating that significant education-related differences in expressed prejudice remain under conditions in which the tendency to give socially desirable responses is reduced. Finally, path analysis based on the survey data show that part but not all of the association between low education and ethnic prejudice is mediated by social psychological variables, particularly group relative deprivation, perceived belief incongruency, political conservatism, and acceptance of inter-ethnic contact.

[1]  Hans C. Buechler,et al.  Migrants in Europe: The Role of Family, Labor, and Politics , 1987 .

[2]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Current Stereotypes: A Little Fading, a Little Faking. , 1971 .

[3]  J. J. Ray.  Racism, conservatism and social class in Australia: With German, Californian and South African comparisons , 1990 .

[4]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Education and Intergroup Attitudes , 1981 .

[5]  T. V. Dijk.  Elite Discourse And Racism , 1993 .

[6]  S. Hinkle,et al.  Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach , 1989 .

[7]  M. Jackman.  General and Applied Tolerance: Does Education Increase Commitment to Racial Integration? , 1978 .

[8]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[9]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Race and Relative Deprivation in the Urban United States , 1972 .

[10]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe , 1995 .

[11]  J. Yinger,et al.  Racial And Cultural Minorities , 1953 .

[12]  M. Jackman.  Education and prejudice or education and response-set? , 1973, American sociological review.

[13]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[14]  Harold Sigall,et al.  The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. , 1971 .

[15]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[16]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[17]  B. Ekehammar,et al.  Social Status: Construct and External Validity , 1987 .

[18]  C. Insko,et al.  Belief congruence and racial discrimination: Review of the evidence and critical evaluation , 1983 .

[19]  T. Burns,et al.  Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England , 1966 .

[20]  Christopher Spencer,et al.  Social stereotypes held by different occupational groups in post-revolutionary Iran , 1982 .