Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and eye closure destabilize moving bistable structure-from-motion displays

Our brain constantly tries to anticipate the future by using a variety of memory mechanisms. Interestingly, studies using the intermittent presentation of multistable displays have shown little perceptual persistence for interruptions longer than a few hundred milliseconds. Here we examined whether we can facilitate the perceptual stability of bistable displays following a period of invisibility by employing a physically plausible and ecologically valid occlusion event sequence, as opposed to the typical intermittent presentation, with sudden onsets and offsets. To this end, we presented a bistable rotating structure-from-motion display that was moving along a linear horizontal trajectory on the screen and either was temporarily occluded by another object (a cardboard strip in Exp. 1, a computer-generated image in Exp. 2) or became invisible due to eye closure (Exp. 3). We report that a bistable rotation direction reliably persisted following occlusion or interruption only (1) if the pre- and postinterruption locations overlapped spatially (an occluder with apertures in Exp. 2 or brief, spontaneous blinks in Exp. 3) or (2) if an object’s size allowed for the efficient grouping of dots on both sides of the occluding object (large objects in Exp. 1). In contrast, we observed no persistence whenever the pre- and postinterruption locations were nonoverlapping (large solid occluding objects in Exps. 1 and 2 and long, prompted blinks in Exp. 3). We report that the bistable rotation direction of a moving object persisted only for spatially overlapping neural representations, and that persistence was not facilitated by a physically plausible and ecologically valid occlusion event.

[1]  A S Bregman,et al.  Auditory streaming and the continuity illusion , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Rachel N. Denison,et al.  Predictive Context Influences Perceptual Selection during Binocular Rivalry , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Jun-Young Chung,et al.  Neural correlates of eye blinking; improved by simultaneous fMRI and EOG measurement , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  D. Barraclough,et al.  Learning and decision making in monkeys during a rock-paper-scissors game. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  J. Gyoba,et al.  A new response-time measure of object persistence in the tunnel effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Alexander Maier,et al.  Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns , 2003, Current Biology.

[8]  Haishan Yao,et al.  Duality in Binocular Rivalry: Distinct Sensitivity of Percept Sequence and Percept Duration to Imbalance between Monocular Stimuli , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  Robert K. Moore,et al.  Eyeblinks and visual suppression. , 1980, Science.

[10]  P. A. Adams,et al.  The effect of past experience on the perspective reversal of a tridimensional figure. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  Brian J Scholl,et al.  Dynamic Object Individuation in Rhesus Macaques , 2004, Psychological science.

[14]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  K. Koch Introduction to Bayesian Statistics , 2007 .

[16]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Picture Changes During Blinks: Looking Without Seeing and Seeing Without Looking , 2000 .

[18]  D. Melcher Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[22]  T. Knapen,et al.  The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[23]  Cynthia S. Sahm,et al.  Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[25]  D. Barraclough,et al.  Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Luke A. Burke,et al.  On the Tunnel Effect , 1952 .

[27]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[28]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[29]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[30]  G. Orban The extraction of 3D shape in the visual system of human and nonhuman primates. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  J. Braun,et al.  Structure-from-motion: dissociating perception, neural persistence, and sensory memory of illusory depth and illusory rotation , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[32]  Edward H Adelson,et al.  The geometry of the occluding contour and its effect on motion interpretation. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[33]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2018 .

[35]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  Believable change: bistable reversals are governed by physical plausibility. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[36]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Alexander Pastukhov edfImport: Matlab interface to Eyelink EDF files , 2016 .

[38]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations , 2003, Neuron.

[40]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[41]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[43]  R. van Ee,et al.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[44]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: the Role of Adaptation in Inhibition , 2022 .

[45]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[46]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: III. Effects of Interpolation on Reversal Rate of the Cube Presented Repetitively , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Onset Rivalry: Brief Presentation Isolates an Early Independent Phase of Perceptual Competition , 2007, PloS one.