The functional ecology of shoot architecture in sun and shade plants of Heteromeles arbutifolia M. Roem., a Californian chaparral shrub

Abstract The functional roles of the contrasting morphologies of sun and shade shoots of the evergreen shrub Heteromeles arbutifolia were investigated in chaparral and understory habitats by applying a three-dimensional plant architecture simulation model, YPLANT. The simulations were shown to accurately predict the measured frequency distribution of photosynthetic photon flux density (PFD) on both the leaves and a horizontal surface in the open, and gave reasonably good agreement for the more complex light environment in the shade. The sun shoot architecture was orthotropic and characterized by steeply inclined (mean = 71o) leaves in a spiral phyllotaxy with short internodes. This architecture resulted in relatively low light absorption efficiencies (EA) for both diffuse and direct PFD, especially during the summer when solar elevation angles were high. Shade shoots were more plagiotropic with longer internodes and a pseudo-distichous phyllotaxis caused by bending of the petioles that positioned the leaves in a nearly horizontal plane (mean = 5o). This shade-shoot architecture resulted in higher EA values for both direct and diffuse PFD as compared to those of the sun shoots. Differences in EA between sun and shade shoots and between summer and winter were related to differences in projection efficiencies as determined by leaf and solar angles, and by differences in self shading resulting from leaf overlap. The leaves exhibited photosynthetic acclimation to the sun and the shade, with the sun leaves having higher photosynthetic capacities per unit area, higher leaf mass per unit area and lower respiration rates per unit area than shade leaves. Despite having 7 times greater available PFD, sun shoots absorbed only 3 times more and had daily carbon gains only double of those of shade shoots. Simulations showed that sun and shade plants performed similarly in the open light environment, but that shade shoots substantially outperformed sun shoots in the shade light environment. The shoot architecture observed in sun plants appears to achieve an efficient compromise between maximizing carbon gain while minimizing the time that the leaf surfaces are exposed to PFDs in excess of those required for light saturation of photosynthesis and therefore potentially photoinhibitory.

[1]  T. J. Herbert GEOMETRY OF HELIOTROPIC AND NYCTINASTIC LEAF MOVEMENTS , 1992 .

[2]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Mathematical models in plant physiology , 1976 .

[3]  J. Isebrands,et al.  Effects of leaf display on light interception and apparent photosynthesis in two contrasting Populus cultivars during their second growing season. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[4]  James R. Ehleringer,et al.  Non‐random leaf orientation in Lactuca serriola L. , 1984 .

[5]  R. Ryel,et al.  Benefits associated with steep foliage orientation in two tussock grasses of the American Intermountain West. A look at water-use-efficiency and photoinhibition. , 1995 .

[6]  On the Relationship of Plant Geometry to Photosynthetic Response , 1996 .

[7]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Responses of Plants to Multiple Stresses , 1993 .

[8]  Stephen B. Powles,et al.  Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis Induced by Visible Light , 1984 .

[9]  B. Demmig‐Adams,et al.  Photoprotection and Other Responses of Plants to High Light Stress , 1992 .

[10]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occuring along a light gradient , 1997, Oecologia.

[11]  C. Ascaso,et al.  Past, present and future methods of quantification in anatomical and ultrastructural studies of lichens , 1994 .

[12]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. , 1990 .

[13]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis in Nature , 1994 .

[14]  H. S. Horn The adaptive geometry of trees , 1971 .

[15]  R. Ryel,et al.  Foliage Orientation and Carbon Gain in Two Tussock Grasses as Assessed with a New Whole-plant Gas Exchange Model , 1993 .

[16]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia , 1997 .

[17]  A. M. Lewis Plant Stems: Physiology and Functional Morphology , 1997 .

[18]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  THE ROLE OF PHYLLOTACTIC PATTERN AS A “DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINT” ON THE INTERCEPTION OF LIGHT BY LEAF SURFACES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  S. Verma,et al.  Modeling canopy photosynthesis: scaling up from a leaf to canopy in a temperate grassland ecosystem , 1991 .

[20]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses , 1993 .

[21]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  SEEDLING CROWN ORIENTATION AND INTERCEPTION OF DIFFUSE RADIATION IN TROPICAL FOREST GAPS , 1995 .

[22]  M. Küppers,et al.  Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: A question of cost-benefit relationships. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis , 1978 .

[24]  H. Honda,et al.  Tree Branch Angle: Maximizing Effective Leaf Area , 1978, Science.

[25]  Prof. Dr. Francis Hallé,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Plant Stems: Biomechanical Adaptation for Energy Capture and Influence on Species Distributions , 1995 .

[27]  R. J. Porra,et al.  Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy , 1989 .

[28]  J. P. Grime,et al.  7 – Growth Rate, Habitat Productivity, and Plant Strategy as Predictors of Stress Response , 1991 .

[29]  Marian Smith,et al.  EFFECT OF LEAF ANGLE AND ORIENTATION ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND WATER RELATIONS IN SILPHIUM TEREBINTHINACEUM , 1989 .

[30]  D. Sims,et al.  5 – Photosynthetic Acclimation to Changing Light Environments: Scaling from the Leaf to the Whole Plant , 1994 .

[31]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Solar tracking by plants. , 1980, Science.